Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Scott Sommerdorf | Tribune file photo) Republican Congressman Chris Stewart, R-Utah.
House panel hits EPA with subpoena over pollution studies

First Published Aug 02 2013 10:02 am • Last Updated Feb 14 2014 11:31 pm

Washington • House Republicans say they are tired of asking the Environmental Protection Agency to provide the underlying data used in studies tying pollution to serious health problems.

So, they issued a subpoena late Thursday, the first from the Science Committee in 21 years.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, who leads a subcommittee that oversees the EPA, joined with Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, in demanding troves of data from long-range pollution studies that the agency has used in crafting new and proposed regulations to clamp down on smog, soot and power plant emissions.

They claim the agency’s use of "secret science" is suspect and could indicate the process is driven by politics rather than data.

"Given that the data sets in question are used to justify new costly regulations, it is imperative that this information be open and transparent," Stewart said.

The subpoena gives the agency until Aug. 19 to hand over data collected by Harvard University and the American Cancer Society.

EPA officials and Democrats on the Science Committee strongly reject the Republicans insinuations and the agency says it is attempting to be as open as it can be about studies that rely on the private health information of more than 1 million Americans.

The top Democrat on the committee, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Texas, said even if the researchers handed over the confidential data, the Republicans on the committee didn’t employ anyone qualified to review it. Legitimate researchers, she said, have other avenues to access the data as long as they follow confidentiality rules.

"You have requested the personal medical histories of literally hundreds of thousands of American citizens. And for what purpose?" she wrote in a letter to Smith this week. "There is no conceivable way that you or your staff could meaningfully use this data to refute the seminal health studies you seem preoccupied with attacking."

The EPA has requested that researchers hand over the information that the Republicans have requested and officials say they have produced all of the information at their disposal.


story continues below
story continues below

"I want to emphasize, however, that the fact that some of the data is not public in no way undermines the validity of the studies’ results. Nor does it call into question the EPA’s reliance on those studies, along with thousands of other peer-reviewed studies,," wrote Janet McCabe, EPA’s acting assistant administrator, in a letter to Smith on Tuesday.

The data dispute is just one front in the Republicans’ critical look at the EPA’s actions under President Barack Obama.

The House, which the GOP controls, has sought to cut the agency’s funding by one-third and has criticized attempts to restrict emissions at coal-fired power plans and attempts to regulate the levels of acceptable ozone.

A new ozone standard could have a significant impact on Utah, where naturally occurring levels of ozone are higher than in other states because of its elevation and frequent wildfires. The EPA has yet to determine how strict a standard to apply, but if counties fail it could result in less federal funding and restrictions on further construction projects.

mcanham@sltrib.com

Twitter: @mattcanham



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.