Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Proposed Emery refinery targeted by conservation groups
First Published Jul 22 2013 05:54 pm • Last Updated Dec 07 2013 11:35 pm

Conservation groups have taken aim at a proposed oil refinery near Green River.

They are challenging a permit approved last month by the Utah Division of Air Quality, a decision they contend will harm the region’s air if the plant begins refining oil shale and tar sands from the Colorado River Basin’s Green River Formation.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"People travel from all over the world to enjoy the stunning vistas at Arches and Canyonlands national parks as well as Dead Horse Point," said David Garbett of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. "It makes no sense to risk compromising the remarkable views this region offers with visibility-reducing pollution from this refinery."

Mike McCandless, Emery County’s economic development director, said the refinery does not plan to process tar sands or oil shale, although those were identified as initial sources in early stages of the permitting process.

"They plan to use existing, sweet and wax crude’s already being produced in Utah," he said.

Air-quality regulators approved a pollution permit for the $224 million Emery Refining plant that would allow production of up to 20,000 barrels per day. Equipped with up-to-date emissions controls, the plant would be limited to 144.83 tons of key pollutants a year, 2.71 tons of hazardous air pollutants, and no more than 90.096 tons per year of carbon dioxide, a key component in the pollution blamed for climate change.

The Governor’s Office of Economic Development gave a $12.7 million post-performance credit to the joint venture funded by London-based finance firm Bridgehouse Capital Ltd. and Woodrock & Co., a Houston-based investment bank. The plant is planned for a site 4 miles west of Green River in Emery County.

The challenge first faces a review by an administrative law judge on behalf of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality. If either side rejects the agency’s final ruling, the case would go to an appeals court.


Twitter: @judyfutah

story continues below

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.