Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
House OKs more money to remove Moab tailings, build CUP

First Published Jul 11 2013 03:23 pm • Last Updated Jul 31 2013 04:21 pm

Washington » The House this week added more money to remove radioactive tailings on the banks of the Colorado River near Moab and some funds to continue building the water pipelines for the Central Utah Project — but much less than officials were hoping for.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, pushed through a $4.22 million bump to the cleanup of the uranium mining tailings over what President Barack Obama had suggested in his budget. The extra funds, if ultimately approved, would allow the radioactive material removal to continue year-round.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"I’m a fiscal hawk but we need to clean up that mess in Moab," said Chaffetz, who began representing Grand County in January following a redrawing of the congressional districts. "I assured voters this is a priority. I’ve been working closely with the committee and I’m thrilled that they’ve seen fit to increase money for the cleanup of the Moab tailings."

Last year, Congress appropriated $30 million for the cleanup, an amount that kept work going for nine months. The House-passed bill offers $40 million.

A mountain of uranium-processing waste, about six million tons, has been shipped to a special landfill about 30 miles north of Moab, but another 10 million tons remain; the project could take until 2018 to complete.

Lynn Jackson, the vice chairman of the Grand County Council, says the extra funds will help, especially so that workers don’t have to expect unemployment for part of the year.

"It solves two problems: the short-term employment problem," he said. "And two, to get those things out of there and store them where they should be."

Funding isn’t certain.

The Senate is still working on its water budget legislation and the White House has threatened to veto the House measure because officials believe it shorts "critical investments."

The overall bill is significantly smaller than what the president asked for and what is in current law.

story continues below
story continues below


CUP fight » White House advisers specifically called out the Central Utah Project as part of the veto threat, noting that the legislation doesn’t, as the president requested, move the effort under the authority of the Bureau of Reclamation. The Eisenhower-era CUP — meant to move water from the Colorado River system to growing communities on the Wasatch Front — was moved away from that agency in 1992 after complaints it was slow-walking the project.

The White House said moving CUP back under reclamation would consolidate administrative and budget tasks while "not adversely affecting project performance."

The House this week declined to go along with the change.

But lawmakers did add more money to the project than Obama had asked for. The president’s budget called for spending $3.5 million for CUP when the project had received $25.4 million the year prior.

The House appropriated $8.72 million for CUP.

"It’s so much better than zero or $3.5 million," says Christine Finlinson, government affairs director for the CUP. "We’re grateful for what we can get. We still have so much project left to build that, of course, we are scrambling to get done what we can."

Finlinson and other CUP officials have argued that working as a stand-alone project has helped them run efficiently and keep construction on schedule.

"What we have been able to achieve with the dollars we have received is quite phenomenal," she said, noting the CUP will continue to push for more funding.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.