Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Utah’s federal land, roads fights a ‘wild goose chase’?
First Published Jun 19 2013 05:29 pm • Last Updated Dec 07 2013 11:34 pm

State leaders’ quest to gain title to federal land and thousands of dirt tracks and roads amounts to "a wild goose chase" that squanders taxpayer money and could ultimately degrade the state’s natural beauty, education advocates told a legislative committee last week.

"We don’t believe these initiatives will solve our education funding issues. We fear they will distract our leaders from seeking realistic and lasting solutions. We are chasing after an imaginary unicorn," said Heather Bennett, a Salt Lake City school board member.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Should the state succeed in winning title to 30 million acres and 12,400 routes, the land could lose the scenic values that "make Utah a fabulous place for family recreation and renewal," she said.

The comments by Bennett, a co-founder of the new campaign called For Kids and Lands, were a blunt challenge to the Legislature’s Natural Resources Interim Committee, whose leadership endorses lawsuits against the federal government in a bid to enable greater resource development on public lands.

Rep. Mike Noel, R-Kanab, used the occasion to blast conservation groups that advocate greater landscape protection.

"You are wrong on this issue. These groups have an agenda and feed you misinformation. They don’t care about your kids. I do," said Noel, among the state’s leading critics of federal land management.

Backers of the state push to take title to federal land say the move is necessary to secure education funding for Utah, which ranks dead-last in per-pupil spending. Getting the state on par with the national average would take $2.6 billion.

That would require doubling the state income tax, which would wreck the economy, said Rep. Ken Ivory, R-West Jordan, who authored the 2012 legislation demanding the land transfer.

The state has done a superior job generating revenue off state lands, backers say as proof that Utah is better suited to manage land than federal authorities.

"This is certainly not a wild goose chase. Funding education through our lands is something we can do," said Rep. Mike McKell, R-Spanish Fork. "I don’t know how we can generate revenue from state lands if we can’t access them."

story continues below
story continues below


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.