Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | The Salt Lake Tribune) Oakridge Country Club in Farmington fought hard against one of the proposed routes of the West Davis Corridor freeway, asserting among other things that its 381 club members should be considered "displaced persons" if the road took out part of one golf hole.
Critics of West Davis freeway route say country club swayed UDOT

West Davis Corridor » Highway officials deny they gave Oakridge special treatment to avoid disrupting golf course.

First Published Jun 24 2013 01:01 am • Last Updated Jun 24 2013 07:53 am

Country clubs are exclusive by design. But critics of the proposed route for the West Davis Corridor say the Oakridge Country Club in Farmington sought special treatment from Utah officials studying whether to take part of one hole on its golf course for the proposed freeway.

Hal Hintze, club attorney, sent an email seeking a meeting with Utah Department of Transportation officials to express concerns over one of the route options for the highway.

At a glance

West Davis Corridor Highway

UDOT is in a 90-day comment period on its draft EIS and preferred route. It hopes to make final decisions next year. No funding has yet been identified for the proposed freeway. However, long-range plans envision construction of the first section from Glover Lane to Antelope Drive by 2020, and completion of the rest to Hooper by 2030.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"I realize the public input time has expired, but the country club should not be relegated to the general status of an interested member of the general ‘public,’ " he wrote.

He added that the club considered itself the "chief landowner affected" by the Shepard Lane alternative, which also would demolish numerous homes and businesses. But he said the club could be hurt more than others because losing part of the hole could downgrade and ruin the entire course.

Documents obtained through an open-records law request show the club fought hard, and successfully, to keep the freeway away. Among its tactics were signaling it might sue, seeing a legislator raise concerns with UDOT and even contending effects of that lost golf hole should make UDOT count all 381 club equity members as potentially "displaced persons" in an environmental impact statement (EIS).

"It does seem like they were seeking special consideration, and it does seem like they may have gotten it," said Lori Kalt, president of the Save Farmington community group opposing the current preferred route — which avoids the golf course — contending it will ruin her Glover Lane neighborhood instead.

"No, we weren’t seeking special treatment," said Mark Jensen, general manager of the country club. "We’re like anybody else. We were just trying to protect our land."

UDOT echoes that.

"They were given consideration, but they were not given special consideration," said Randy Jefferies, project manager for UDOT.


story continues below
story continues below

Documents » Critics of the current preferred route had alleged the club and some local politicians may have unduly pressured UDOT to move the freeway from Shepard Lane to Glover Lane, so The Salt Lake Tribune made an open-records law request for all correspondence between them and UDOT.

Documents showed nothing unusual for the politicians. But some actions by the club were notable — including its assertion that it not be lumped in with the general public for purposes of comment. UDOT then held numerous meetings with Oakridge, which Jefferies said it also did in accommodating many other groups.

Oakridge complained in a March 2012 letter that its concerns had been "glossed over or excluded" from UDOT considerations, even though "no single person or entity will incur more adverse impact from this project."

It said it had most to lose from the possibility that the roadway could take out a portion of its par-4 14th hole.


Special course » "Oakridge is not just an average ‘municipal type’ course — rather, it has all the unique features that make it capable of hosting PGA events," including the Utah Open and the regional U.S. open qualifying tournament, the club wrote. It said UDOT’s proposal would ruin that by forcing shortening of the 14th hole.

It said that would mean three par-3 holes in a row, something not done by championship courses, and would downgrade the course’s rating and ruin the club. It said that would require redesigning the entire course — if some adjacent land could be bought — at a cost of $3 million to $4 million (later increased to $5 million), and the club might not survive changes.

It added because the course is owned by 381 equity members, the EIS should list them all as "persons displaced or affected" by the freeway. The club signaled it could sue by warning that if the EIS did not fully address such issues and "indicate the quantum of private injury likely to arise," the EIS "would not withstand a challenge as to its adequacy."

Minutes of a Sept. 2, 2012, meeting with area legislators show, "Senator [Jerry] Stevenson [R-Layton] explained concern for the golf course," and UDOT officials responded that they had "been meeting with the golf course" and were "trying to minimize impacts."

Minutes of an earlier July 10, 2012, UDOT meeting with Oakridge officials noted that UDOT officials said then that the "decision on an alternative will not be made by the Legislature," but instead by UDOT and adopted by the Federal Highway Administration. The official record did not explain how or why the topic of legislative authority was introduced at the meeting.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.