Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Isobel Markham | The Salt Lake Tribune) AAA representative Russ Martin wears the EEG cap to measure brain activity and a head-mounted device displaying a flashing light to measure response time.
Utah researcher: Car voice commands more distracting than mobile phones

First Published Jun 12 2013 06:22 am • Last Updated Jun 12 2013 12:14 pm

Landover, Md. » Big engines and cushy seats are not enough for today’s automobile buyers. They want cars fused with computers. Machines that respond to their voice. Access to the Web while changing lanes.

Automakers are responding, but these latest "infotainment" features may be more fun than safe.

At a glance

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

In fact, a new study by University of Utah psychology professor David Strayer indicates they can be downright dangerous — that talking to your car while driving may be more distracting than chatting on a cellphone.

AAA, a leading motorist organization, backed the research, concerned about the proliferation of the new auto technology and how it could lead to widespread driver distraction. Around 9 million cars are now fitted with voice-recognition systems and this number is forecast to soar to 62 million in 2018.

"We think that if we are loud enough and persistent enough then we can save some lives by educating people and making them think twice about using these systems when they get behind the wheel," said AAA spokesman Jacob Nelson.

AAA hopes Strayer’s research may prod the auto industry into making the voice-recognition systems safer and encourage drivers to use the devices judiciously. The group is not asking for laws banning or restricting their use at this time.

"Now is the time to really think more carefully about this and to more responsibly develop these technologies," Nelson said.

Demonstration » On Tuesday afternoon members of the media gathered in a windy parking lot in the shadows of the FedEx Field on the outskirts of Washington, D.C., for a demonstration of Strayer’s research methods. On display were the EEG cap used to measure brain-wave activity and the original Subaru used in the study, which Strayer’s son, Kyle, a University of Utah student, had driven from Utah.

But the study participants, all Utah residents, didn’t start behind the wheel.

story continues below
story continues below

Strayer asked them to perform eight tasks, ranging from listening to the radio to solving a math problem to operating a speech-to-text device, while staring at a cross on a blank computer screen. He then had groups do the same tasks while operating a driving simulator and while driving the Subaru around a 2.75-mile loop in the Avenues area of Salt Lake City.

The results were clear in all three tests: Those hands-free speech-to-text devices were much more distracting than you might think. In fact, they’re worse than talking on a cellphone.

He scored the distraction on a five-point scale, where listening to the radio received a 1.21, talking on a hand-held cellphone got a 2.45 and interacting with an infotainment system registered a 3.06.

"You’re going to fail to notice things," Strayer said. "You’re going to suffer from inattention blindness, and that’s even if it’s a purely voice-based system where your eyes are on the road and your hands are on the wheel."

Distracted-driver research » Strayer is no stranger to the field of distracted-driver research. Along with his colleagues at the Applied Cognition Lab at the University of Utah, he has studied the issue of driver cellphone use for the past decade. In 2007 a study by Strayer and his colleague Frank Drews found that using a hands-free cellphone significantly affects a driver’s ability to react to his or her surroundings and slows response time.

The researchers then concluded that drivers using either hand-held or hands-free cellphones were as impaired as drunken drivers at the legal blood-alcohol limit of .08.

The new research shows that distracted drivers don’t move their eyes from the road as often, getting a form of "tunnel vision." It means drivers check their mirrors less frequently and are less likely to notice peripheral hazards.

"Even the things that you’re looking right at, sometimes you don’t see," Strayer said.

Car manufacturers, though, see potential profits and consumer expectations, and while most advertising focuses on the convenience of the newly equipped vehicles, at least some automakers imply that the hands-free devices are safe.

In January, Chrysler’s UConnect infotainment system won the Technology of the Year award from AOL Autos for providing "a solution to distracted driving."

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.