Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | Tribune File Photo) Chad Smith, of West Valley City, looks at maps at the Legislature's Redistricting Committee came up with during the many public hearings on drawing new voting boundaries in the state.
Judge rules for Utah Democrats in GRAMA dispute
Courts » Judge rules Legislature cannot charge exorbitant fees for records, and it must pay Democratic Party’s $15,000 attorneys cost.
First Published Apr 30 2013 04:18 pm • Last Updated Dec 07 2013 11:30 pm

After an 18-month standoff with the Utah Legislature over the cost and public release of redistricting documents, the Democratic Party prevailed in state court Tuesday, hailing the ruling as a victory for Utahns and their right to scrutinize the government.

Third District Judge L.A. Dever rejected the Legislature’s argument that the court has no jurisdiction to review the redistricting-records request — and Dever ruled the state must pay the Democrats’ attorneys fees, estimated at $15,000.

At a glance

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The decision fortifies the contention by Democrats and Utah media outlets also party to the lawsuit that the 16,000 pages of redistricting documents — posted online in November after a yearlong fight — should be accessible without exorbitant fees as a matter of public interest.

"His decision spoke loudly," said Democratic Party Chairman Jim Dabakis, a state senator, adding the Legislature cannot dismiss people from the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) process by charging them prohibitive fees.

"If they were playing the kind of tricks they were playing on us, it would put a dagger through the heart of GRAMA," Dabakis said. "The Democratic Party thought it was a priority to put an end to the shenanigans and that’s what happened today."

Democrats paid $5,000 in January 2012 for one batch of redistricting records but were told the total cost for assembling all the documents — including 500 hours of staff time and copying charges — was $14,250. That’s when the Democrats sued.

"The records have always been acknowledged as public records — the question was whether the fee should be paid for," explained legislative attorney Robert Rees. He said he does not yet know if the Legislature will appeal.

The $5,000 the party paid will not be refunded.

Democratic Party attorney Joe Hatch, a former Salt Lake County councilman, called the ruling a big victory for public disclosure but says he is concerned state lawmakers will now rewrite rules to deny judicial review of individual GRAMA requests.

Upon release of the redistricting records, then-Senate President Michael Waddoups, R-Taylorsville, said the move should release any suspicion that Republicans had something to hide. Democrats, whom he described as "verging on irrelevance," were overreaching, he said.

story continues below
story continues below

Democrats maintain the newly drawn congressional districts are between 62 and 72 percent Republican, while GOP leaders lower that estimate slightly to between 59 and 72 percent.

Dabakis, who says the public has a right to know about the gerrymandering "disaster," said Tuesday "It will be a generation before we rectify the tremendous injustice that has been done."

According to a Nov. 28, 2012, letter sent from Hatch to Rees, the Democratic Party offered to drop its lawsuit in exchange for $4,200 in attorneys fees accrued at that point. The state refused.

"It’s going to cost the taxpayers a whole lot more money as a result of this," Hatch said. "It could have been resolved cheaply, but it was the Legislature that refused to resolve it cheaply."


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.