Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Hatch, Lee help defeat ‘centerpiece’ gun-control legislation

First Published Apr 17 2013 05:16 pm • Last Updated Apr 17 2013 11:37 pm

Washington • Sens. Orrin Hatch and Mike Lee opposed every gun-control measure on Wednesday, opting instead to back a failed GOP move to expand some gun rights and boost resources for gun prosecutions.

The failure of a much-ballyhooed effort to expand background checks — opposed by Hatch and Lee — could spell doom for President Barack Obama’s effort to boost restrictions on firearm sales in the wake of years of gun-fueled massacres.

At a glance

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Obama called it a "pretty shameful day for Washington," but said the failure was only "round one," and he pressed for continued action.

"I wouldn’t call it dead because something could pass," Lee said moments after casting his ballot against the bipartisan proposal to require background checks for all gun show and online sales.

But Lee noted Wednesday’s vote signaled the death of the "centerpiece" legislation pushed by gun-control advocates and the one significant measure that seemed to have the most likely chance of passing.

"What we see in this proposal is something that would do little if anything to prevent violent crime while simultaneously burdening, however incrementally, the rights of law-abiding Americans," Lee said.

Lee and Hatch both voted for a Republican amendment that would increase resources for gun prosecutions, augment mental health screenings and add to school security, as well as permit interstate handgun sales.

But the Utah GOP duo opposed an amendment to limit the size of gun magazines or enact an assault-weapons ban. None of the amendments voted on Wednesday met the 60-vote threshold needed to pass.

Hatch — who said he "hopes" the gun-control legislation is done for good — said the measures were "political more than anything else."

"There are so many things wrong with [the background check bill] it would take too long to talk about," Hatch said. "My heart goes out and my empathy goes out for the people who have suffered but there isn’t anything in that bill that would solve any of those problems in any of those major incidents."

story continues below
story continues below

The National Rifle Association heralded the vote against more background checks.

"As we have noted previously, expanding background checks, at gun shows or elsewhere, will not reduce violent crime or keep our kids safe in their schools," said the group’s chief lobbyist, Chris Cox.

Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican who crossed the aisle to back the background-check expansion, said before the vote that what mattered was that the attempt was made — and that the senators backing the amendment were on the right side of history.

"You may not win today ... but you did the right thing," McCain said. "Doing the right thing is always a reward unto itself."

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., was even more blunt, surrounding himself with families of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre to decry the anti-gun-control votes.

"Today, fear, mistruth, brute political force won out over what is right and America will be a less safe place because of it," Schumer said. "But I say to the families, I say to the American people many of whom cannot understand what’s happening here in this Capitol, don’t give up faith."

The Senate voted on seven of the nine amendments to the gun bill on Wednesday night and planned to return Thursday to finish off three proposed tweaks that would separately limit magazine size, expand mental health services and ensure that states could not share data on gun ownership.

Taking a stern tone, Obama said late Wednesday that senators were not listening to the 90 percent of Americans who supported expanded background checks.

"All that happened today was the preservation of a loophole that allows dangerous criminals to buy guns," Obama said. "Victory for not doing something that 90 percent of Americans, 80 percent of Republicans, the vast majority of your constituents wanted to get done? It begs the question, who are we here to represent?"

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.