Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
This undated image provided by the US Fish and Wildlife Service shows a gray wolf resting in tall grass. (AP Photo/US Fish & Wildlife/FILE)
Attempt to strip dollars for anti-wolf lobbyist fails
Budget » Some Republicans join in opposition to funding, citing ‘accountability.’
First Published Mar 12 2013 09:43 pm • Last Updated Mar 12 2013 11:05 pm

An attempt to strip out of a budget bill $300,000 to try to get the gray wolf removed from the endangered species list fell short Tuesday.

Rep. Patrice Arent, D-Millcreek, argued the wolf-lobbying contract lacked accountability or information about what the contract had accomplished.

Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"For a body that cares about accountability, it’s my information that we have very little information about how the $300,000 was spent last year and money that was spent in previous years was used," she said.

Arent wanted to use the money for a program that encourages women to attend college which is losing its funding this year, and to pay for the Department of Environmental Quality’s emergency response and monitoring equipment at the Division of Air Quality.

Rep. Francis Gibson, R-Mapleton, said that he, too, has asked for information about the lobbying contract and not received adequate answers.

"I don’t know how I feel about wolves. To me the issue is accountability," he said.

Rep. Mike McKell, R-Spanish Fork, said the money to fight for the delisting of the wolf is important.

"We’re fighting the Endangered Species Act which is a federal tool that hurts us in this state," he said. "This is a battle that is certainly worthy of fighting."

And House Budget Chairman Mel Brown, R-Coalville, said that, while he has been critical of the money for the wolf-lobbying in the past, he said that environmental groups have persuaded federal agencies to postpone taking the wolf off the Endangered Species List.

The money the Legislature proposed spending would get the process moving again, Brown said.


story continues below
story continues below

"I’d hate to see us, at this point, vacate a process we’ve spent a lot of money on in previous years," Brown said.

Arent’s attempt failed 42-23.



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.