Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | The Salt Lake Tribune) Andrew Riggle, advocate for the Disability Law Center, left, waits in line to testify after Louis Fazio, an advocate for the Coalition for People with Disabilities, at a Social Services Appropriations hearing Friday. The committee was hearing testimony on whether to expand the low-income health program Medicaid.
GOP lawmakers jump to reject Medicaid expansion
Health care » Advocates and many lawmakers blindsided by abrupt bill switch.
First Published Mar 06 2013 10:05 pm • Last Updated May 31 2013 11:32 pm

In a surprise move Wednesday, Republicans on a House committee pushed through a bill that would prevent Utah from expanding Medicaid coverage to more than 130,000 low-income Utahns under Obamacare.

"No one saw this coming," said Judi Hilman, executive director of the Utah Health Policy Project, a group that supports the expansion.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The bill on the agenda, HB391, would have sought to nullify the Affordable Care Act and carried a warning from legislative lawyers that it was likely unconstitutional.

But Rep. Jake Anderegg, R-Lehi, said he was concerned that bill would not pass and instead swapped it for language prohibiting Utah from participating in the Medicaid expansion.

Anderegg argued that taking the federal money is "like eating your foot because you think there’s protein there."

"At the end of the day, it’s still your foot you’re eating," he said.

The bill was approved by the Business and Labor Committee by a 9-6 vote, but not without some testy exchanges among committee members and efforts by advocates who scrambled to stop what they viewed as a blindside.

Rep. Jim Bird, R-West Jordan, said he saw the substitute bill just three minutes before it was voted on and was taken aback by the process, saying Rep. Lee Perry’s nullification bill "has, in essence, been hijacked."

And Rep. Johnny Anderson, R-Taylorsville, argued that Utah fought Obamacare, including challenging it in court, but it is now the law and if the state rejects the Medicaid expansion Utah taxpayers will be paying to cover those in other states.

"At some point we’ve got to … say, ‘Yeah, we really did lose,’" said Rep. Dixon Pitcher, R-Ogden.


story continues below
story continues below

The state has commissioned a cost-benefit analysis on the Medicaid expansion — which would cover 131,000 Utahns who make up to 138 percent of the poverty level — and Gov. Gary Herbert has said he plans to make a decision on whether to take the federal money sometime this summer.

Herbert has expressed concerns about the costs, both to the state and whether the federal government can afford the expanded program. But Republican governors in other states, notably New Jersey and Florida, recently opted into the program.

Twenty-eight states have opted into the expanded coverage or are leaning toward it; 17 states have rejected it. Utah is one of five that is undecided.

The federal government has committed to paying all the costs of the expansion in the first years, phasing down to 90 percent of the expense over time.

Hilman urged members not to tie the state’s hands before the data is in.

"I think what you’re deciding now is: Do you want to make a decision without information and based on pure ideology?" she said. "Do you want to make a blind decision or not? And I don’t think you do."

And Rep. Dana Layton, R-Orem, said it is "presumptuous" to think lawmakers don’t understand the Medicaid issue and the choice is simple.

"Sometimes there are deal-breaker pieces of information where you don’t need to study further because it’s just too expensive," she said.

The Legislative Fiscal Analyst has estimated that the Medicaid expansion would save the state about $6 million in the first year and nearly $16 million in the second year.

That’s largely because the federal government would pay the $248 million price tag and the expanded program would cover the prison population, youth in state custody and those with mental-health and addiction issues.

"This gives us an opportunity to leverage federal funding that is our own taxpayer money to provide these services," said Rep. Rebecca Chavez-Houck, D-Salt Lake City, who asked the committee to study the expansion over the summer — which the committee agreed to do before the vote on Anderegg’s bill.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.