Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) The Utah State Prison in Draper shown in this 2010 file photo. The Utah Prison Relocation Commission will have a proposed plot of land for a new prison to present to legislators at the next session in January.
Senate OKs bill to seek bids on moving, running prison
Corrections » The relocation bill calling for prison committee to start seeking bids advances to the House.
First Published Mar 05 2013 09:42 pm • Last Updated Mar 07 2013 07:45 am

With virtually no debate, the Utah Senate approved a fourth version of a bill Tuesday evening to seek bids from companies interested not only in relocating the state prison — but also inviting proposals for operating it.

The heavily revamped SB72S4, sponsored by Sen. Scott Jenkins, R-Plain City, says the request for proposals "may include" bids to build a new prison as well as oversee its programming and operation.

At a glance

Bill language would allow proposals for private prison

“A request for proposals for a new prison development project: may include a request for prison programming proposals; and shall allow an offeror to include, as part of the proposal, the operation of the new prison. A person submitting a proposal for a new prison development project may include, as part of the proposal, prison programming proposals; or the operation of a new prison.”

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Jenkins said the language about private operation of the prison was inserted into the measure about a week ago. Placed deep within what was then a 30-page bill, the provision received little attention and hasn’t figured into the public debate. The latest version of the bill, which appeared Tuesday, is just six pages long.

Bidders would be required to "identify and quantify" funds that make a new prison financially feasible, including land sales, deferred maintenance and construction expenses, and savings from reduced operational and labor expenses. They also must specify amount of bonds, legislative appropriations and financing provided by the developer.

SB72S4 would use the same board structure set up by the Legislature last year to seek, review and select proposals to relocate the existing prison and tear down the old one in Draper. That board — the Prison Relocation and Development Authority — found the project was economically feasible. At least three companies who submitted initial information packets last year to PRADA have experience in operating prison facilities, either solely or in partnership with government.

Under its proposed new duties the board also would recommend to the governor and legislative leaders a "master development project" for the 690 acres the facility now occupies.

The plan also would have to be approved by the full Legislature.

Three Republicans — Wayne Harper, David Hinkins and Lyle Hillyard — joined four Democrats in voting against the bill. Hillyard said he was concerned about the process and wanted independent advisers to monitor it.

Senate President Wayne Niederhauser, R-Sandy, was among the 19 senators who voted for the bill. Niederhauser acknowledged last week his real estate development business owns a housing project four miles from the current prison but denied any conflict of interest or potential benefit. Niederhauser is the handpicked successor of former Senate President Al Mansell, who has pushed for prison relocation beginning two years ago.

Asked about anticipated costs, Jenkins, the bill sponsor, said: "The fiscal note will have to catch up to the bill."

story continues below
story continues below

The proposal keeps intact some — but not all — changes the Senate made to the bill on Monday, when it moved to lessen the governor’s control over the composition of the initially proposed executive board.

The Senate also scrapped a provision that would have allowed PRADA to divert up to 50 percent of tax revenue from new development on the current prison site to pay for the project.

One senator characterized that as a "gift" to project bidders and out-of-step with the normal process for approving tax increment financing; another said it amounted to an "entitlement."

Jenkins had identified revenue sharing as one of the "tools" for funding a new, $550 million to $600 million prison outside the Salt Lake Valley’s urban corridor. Other funds would come from selling the current prison acreage for $100 million to $140 million; annual operational and labor savings estimated at $17 million to $20 million; and deferred maintenance of about $3 million a year.

The Governor’s Office of Economic Development has projected that in time, commercial development at the site could create up to 40,000 jobs and generate up to $20 billion in tax revenue over 20 years — an economic impact that justifies moving the prison.

But senators made clear on Monday building a new prison should be a self-funding project, accomplished through savings rather than tax revenue. "If it doesn’t pencil without this tax-increment funding, I really don’t believe we should do it," said Sen. Mark Madsen, R-Eagle Mountain.

SB72 now will begin to work its way through the House, which passed a resolution on Tuesday encouraging the state to rely more on county jails to handle growing numbers of inmates and rising incarceration costs as part of considering whether to build a new prison facility.

The Utah Department of Corrections currently contracts with 20 county jails, which together house more than 20 percent of state inmates. The department expects to use jails to handle future growth, which it estimates at 24 female inmates and 108 male inmates per year. Some counties — such as Beaver, San Juan, Kane and Millard — now provide substance abuse and sex offender programming.


Twitter: @brooke4trib

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.