Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | The Salt Lake Tribune) Rep Kay McIff, R-Richfield, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee questions Rep. Brian Greene, R-Pleasant Grove about HB114S1 Second Amendment Preservation Act Monday March 4. The bill will would have Utah gun laws trump federal laws.
Bill advances giving Utah upper hand in gun showdown with feds
HB114 » The bill would make state statute trump federal regulations.
First Published Mar 04 2013 10:40 am • Last Updated May 31 2013 11:32 pm

In a conflict between federal and state laws related to firearms sales or possession, Utah’s statute would reign supreme under a bill advanced Monday by the House Judiciary Committee.

Rep. Brian Greene, R-Pleasant Grove, watered down his original version of HB114 by removing a controversial provision making it a felony for any federal agent who attempted to seize guns from Utahns, but the measure clung to its core motive — allowing the state to retain control over its firearms laws.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"It’s a much more condensed bill compared to the original," Greene said, "but I think it establishes firmly that we believe, as a state, that we are the primary safeguards ... of our state."

HB114 passed 7-2, with two Democrats opposing it.

The measure is similar to about two dozen other bills introduced in legislatures nationwide that push back against proposals by President Barack Obama to change current gun laws, including an effort to close loopholes on background checks and reduce magazine capacity on firearms.

Under Greene’s proposal, such provisions would not hold legal primacy in Utah and the state would restrict U.S. agents from enforcing those federal laws.

HB114 is also one of several measures being pushed by Utah lawmakers to loosen gun laws, including a proposal by Rep. John Mathis, R-Vernal, who wants to do away with a requirement to obtain a concealed-weapons permit in order to carry a gun hidden from view.

But while four high-profile gun measures passed through committees on Feb. 20 — dubbed "Gun Day" at the Utah Capitol — Greene’s was the only one that languished in committee. Monday’s hearing was its third attempt at getting through after the first two were hamstrung by lengthy public testimony and concerns by several lawmakers about a lengthy analysis as to whether the measure would hold up to constitutional scrutiny.

It was a key reason as to why Rep. Brian King, D-Salt Lake City, opposed the measure. He cited the legal analysis offered by legislative attorneys who believe the measure violates the Supremacy and Commerce clauses of the U.S. Constitution.

"The regulation of arms," King said, "is squarely within the duty of Congress."

story continues below
story continues below

Rep. V. Lowry Snow, R-Santa Clara, also worried about the bill’s sweeping effect on agencies such as the Transportation Security Administration and its ability to enforce federal firearm laws at airports or U.S. marshals executing warrants on federal crimes.

Snow, an attorney, who ultimately voted for the bill, said he would work with Greene on those issues before the measure reached the House floor.

The proposal may also have trouble in the Utah Senate.

Senate President Wayne Niederhauser, R-Sandy, said he’d prefer the gun bills be vetted through Senate committees, but with Greene’s measure still awaiting a House floor vote with 10 days left in the session, the time crunch may be too severe.

Sen. Majority Leader Ralph Okerlund, R-Monroe, also said that even though the felony charges were removed from HB114, the concerns raised by Snow as well as the constitutional note attached to the measure remained problematic.

Clark Aposhian, chairman of the Utah Shooting Sports Council, said he was glad to see the measure advance and believed the bill sent a strong message to the federal government.

"If you violate the Constitution, if you come into Utah and violate our laws ... just because you’re a federal official doesn’t give you an exemption to that," Aposhian said. "If you violate the Second Amendment, the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution, well you can’t play fast and loose with that."

The measure now moves to the full House.


Twitter: @davemontero

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.