Quantcast
Get news, sports and politics alerts

Click here to manage your alerts
Officials wish they knew Swallow allegations before election
Utah » House speaker says voters should have had more information before casting ballots.
First Published Feb 12 2013 08:16 pm • Last Updated May 20 2013 10:00 pm

State leaders said Tuesday that the public could have known more about the allegations of impropriety against Attorney General John Swallow before the election.

Their comments come in response to news that former Attorney General Mark Shurt­leff said that he met on several occasions with federal prosecutors after he learned that Swallow had helped Utah businessman and Shurtleff donor Jeremy Johnson, who was under investigation by federal regulators.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Shurtleff didn’t share the information publicly. Gov. Gary Herbert said that is a decision for Shurtleff to have made.

"Could it have been done better?" Herbert asked. "In hindsight, probably yes."

Herbert reiterated that he wants to avoid a rush to judgment, however, and that Swallow is entitled to due process.

House Speaker Becky Lockhart, R-Provo, said the more information about candidates, the better equipped voters are to make a decision, and she wishes the information involving Swallow would have been known before the election. If it had been known, she said, it could have made a difference in her vote.

"Attorney General Shurt­leff is going to have to answer those questions," she said, "and he’s going to be accountable for those actions and why or why not he didn’t disclose that."

Shurtleff said in a message Tuesday that, at the time he learned of the allegations in late October, they were just that, allegations. But he believed federal authorities should look into the matter further.

Swallow says he merely helped connect Johnson with a friend — the late owner of the Provo-based Check City payday-loan chain, Richard Rawle — whom Johnson paid $250,000 to hire two lobbyists. Johnson has said the payment was the first installment on a $600,000 arrangement aimed at enlisting Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to intervene on Johnson’s behalf with the Federal Trade Commission — an effort Johnson has characterized, at times, as a bribe.

Reid’s office has denied any knowledge of Johnson’s case. The U.S. attorney’s office has confirmed it is investigating.


story continues below
story continues below



Copyright 2013 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Shopping
Contests and Promotions