Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
New GRAMA open-records law reforms win praise
First Published Feb 11 2013 11:05 am • Last Updated Feb 12 2013 08:08 pm

Two years ago, a quickly passed bill that weakened Utah’s open records law led to massive protests and front-page opposition editorials that pressured legislators into repealing the legislation. A much friendlier scene occurred Monday.

News media and legislators joined hands to advance a bill that both say will increase transparency and reduce costs of open records requests as SB94 passed 7-0 in the Senate Business and Labor Committee.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Its sponsor, Sen. Curt Bramble, R-Provo, said it will allow lawmakers, if they choose, to put selected emails that they send or receive onto a public website. The bill would also clearly make public the signatures on petitions to put referendums or initiatives on ballots.

Bramble said the new bill was prompted by a battle waged by Democrats last year seeking legislators’ emails about redistricting, through a Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) request.

Bramble noted lawmakers had to print out any emails and attachments that possibly mentioned the topic — which led to high costs for Democrats, and duplication of many identical emails among members.

He said most emails had little to do with redistricting — and providing stacks of them led to assertions that lawmakers were trying to run up the cost for the request. He said costs could have been reduced if members simply had been able to forward many of their emails that clearly needed no administrative review to a public website.

"It’s important that we continue our march to more openness and transparency," Bramble said.

Linda Petersen, managing editor of the Valley Journals newspapers, representing the Utah Media Coalition, said the "bill definitely furthers transparency by our government." She said the cost of the current practice of printing out emails and attachments for review and release "can really be prohibitive," and the change could help lower costs.

She also said she supported disclosing to the public who signed petitions for referendums because "if we as a citizenry are going to make law, we need to put our stamp on it and publicly put our name" on it.


story continues below
story continues below

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.