Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Bill seeks to require free release of public-interest documents
Disclosure » Proposal aimed at combating high fees charged by some agencies.
First Published Feb 07 2013 10:47 am • Last Updated Feb 07 2013 10:06 pm

Amid concerns that state agencies may sometimes use high fees as a back-door way to deny open-records requests, a lawmaker is trying to force agencies to provide for free any documents whose release is deemed to be in the public interest.

Rep. Brian King, D-Salt Lake City, introduced HB122 on Thursday to change current law, which merely encourages agencies to provide documents for free. The proposal would require free records when their disclosure would be more in the public interest than personal interest.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

That comes after Democrats last year had a long, high-profile fight with legislative leaders over release of 16,000 pages of documents dealing with redistricting. The party was originally told that would cost $5,000, then was charged $14,250 instead — and the Legislature initially would not turn over two of three boxes of documents until all fees were paid.

After a year of fighting, the Legislature finally posted all those documents online — after Democrats filed a lawsuit. GOP leaders said they hoped that would end the lawsuit, but it is still pending as Democrats seek a return of the $5,000 they paid plus attorney’s fees.

King said he introduced his bill not just because of that fight, but to help increase appropriate access to public records.

"Despite the language in the statute [the Government Records Access and Management Act, or GRAMA] saying agencies are encouraged to waive the fees, they often said, ‘It’s still within our discretion, so we’re not going to do it,’ " King said.

"Public access to information shapes our democracy and is the lifeblood of good public policy. If we are undermining access, we are undermining democracy," King said. He said he expects a tough fight for the bill, especially because it could increase costs during tight economic times.

ldavidson@sltrib.com




Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.