Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Courtesy of Shane Farver Shadows encroach on Chesler Park in Canyonlands National Park last March.
Greater Canyonlands protection bill referred for further study
Protection » Proposal survives but instead of the Senate floor is sent to interim study.
First Published Feb 07 2013 05:54 pm • Last Updated Feb 07 2013 10:06 pm

Greater Canyonlands is "a spiritual reservoir" and "a geologic truth that belongs to all of us," author Terry Tempest Williams told a Senate panel Thursday, asking it to advance a resolution seeking unspecified protections for this world-famous landscape in southeast Utah.

"It’s local, it’s in our DNA, it’s national, it’s international. There must be a way we can work together so that it’s not Republican, not Democrat," the celebrated nature writer said.

At a glance

Greater Canyonlands

Democratic lawmakers’ SJR10 asked the federal government to initiate a public process for protecting the 1.5 million scenic and remote acres of canyons and mesas surrounding Canyonlands National Park. The measure was referred for interim study by the Senate Natural Resources Committee Thursday.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

But Williams’ plea failed to sway a single Republican to advance SJR10 to the Senate floor, where she hoped it would initiate a discussion on how best to safeguard the state’s natural treasures.

The Senate Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment Committee, however, did not kill outright the measure, sponsored by Sen. Jim Dabakis, but instead assigned it to interim study for a year.

"I want to protect these lands, but I want to use a different mechanism than federal control," Sen. Evan Vickers, R-Cedar City, told the measure’s supporters who packed the committee room and spilled into the hallway. "I have more trust in the people who use the land."

Yet Dabakis, a Salt Lake City Democrat who chairs the state party, cautioned that if the state doesn’t act soon, it may lose a say over what happens to the 1.5-million-acre redrock labyrinth of canyons, plateaus and wind-sculpted sandstone features. He warned of a "shipwreck" in which President Barack Obama could invoke the Antiquities Act to declare Greater Canyonlands a national monument, thereby imposing a designation without much regard for how Utahns want the region managed.

But his Republican colleagues were deeply suspicious of the word "protection," fearing it could lead to restrictions that would "lock out" all but those fit enough to hike in.

The region has 2,200 miles of routes that conservationists say they do not seek to shut down to motorized travel. Their continued use is compatible with conservation goals, according to Terri Martin of the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.

"It would be a spectrum of activities. There’s a lot of access there. This is not about closing this place up," she said.

While Greater Canyonlands is largely federally owned, about 9 percent of it the state holds in trust for schools.

story continues below
story continues below

"It’s always a concern for us when people draw lines on a map and talk about special designations," said Paula Plant of the State Office of Education. She was concerned that the costs associated with exchanging state lands would "come out the schoolchildren’s pocket."

But most of the speakers Thursday argued this land would generate more wealth and serve education best if drill rigs and backhoes are kept out. The region also harbors wildlife and remnants of ancient cultures preserved in dry caves, speakers said.

"If we protect it, visitors will come forever. If we neglect it, no one will come," said Kevin Jones, Utah’s former state archaeologist.


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.