Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Scott Sommerdorf | The Salt Lake Tribune) Rep. Dana Layton, R-Orem, takes a photo of herself with "Ronald McDonald" who was on the hill to promote McDonald's restaurants in the Utah House of Representatives, Wednesday, February 6, 2013.
Utah House bill would extend protective orders to dating relationships
HB50 » House Committee votes unanimously to advance the bill.
First Published Feb 06 2013 07:57 pm • Last Updated Feb 07 2013 04:53 pm

In 2011, Ashley Bambrough was beaten nearly to death.

Wednesday evening at the state Capitol, her father, Jon, told lawmakers that Ashley’s boyfriend of three years attacked her, then threw her from a speeding truck. When Jon arrived at the hospital, he saw that his daughter was covered in blood, had a shattered head and "the flesh had been torn" from her face. She survived but still suffers from the assault.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Jon Bambrough was at the Capitol to encourage lawmakers to pass HB50, which is sponsored by Rep. Jennifer Seelig, D-Salt Lake City. The proposed "Dating Violence Protection Act" would give adults and emancipated minors the right to ask judges for protective orders against people they are dating.

Utah code makes protective orders available for spouses and people who have lived together, but not for people who are dating and never cohabited.

Bambrough said that the bill was needed to protect people like his daughter.

After Bambrough’s remarks and a presentation by Seelig, the House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to advance the bill.

Under the proposal, if a protective order is granted by a judge it would be in effect for 180 days. Violating the order would result in a class B misdemeanor.

Seelig spent much of Wednesday’s meeting explaining the bill’s justification. She said that 15.7 percent of rapes and 17.8 percent of attempted rapes are committed by a "boyfriend or ex-boyfriend." She also provided a long list of organizations that support the bill.

Members of the committee seemed mostly supportive, though several also expressed concern with the proposal. Among other things, Rep. LaVar Christensen asked if current laws — such as stalking injunctions or standard protective orders — already provided sufficient protection.

Seelig replied that other types of protections require repeated violent incidents and are more difficult to obtain. A fiscal note on the bill states that if passed, it would cost the courts $124,200 and the Department of Corrections $27,400 in fiscal year 2014.

story continues below
story continues below


Twitter: jimmycdii

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.