Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Foster the People. Courtesy photo)
Chaffetz’s radio bill panned by musicians, conservatives

First Published Nov 28 2012 11:05 am • Last Updated Mar 06 2013 11:34 pm

Washington • If Rep. Jason Chaffetz wants to drop the royalty rates for online radio to the same level paid by satellite and cable companies, he’ll have to overcome the loud and melodious protests of some of the nation’s most popular musicians.

The young conservative star from Utah will also have to tame some of the biggest names in Republican politics.

At a glance

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Chaffetz’s Internet Radio Fairness Act is getting slammed by the American Conservative Union, Citizens Against Government Waste and Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform. They see no reason why the government sets royalty standards on radio outside of traditional stations that use the public airwaves and they are incensed that Chaffetz’s proposal would set music royalties below what artists could get in direct negotiations.

"When the government sets the rate for music, it is enacting price controls, in opposition to what should be the agenda of a Congress that supports the market economy," Norquist wrote in a letter to congressional leaders.

Chaffetz said Norquist is "totally misinformed" about his bill, and the Utah Republican doesn’t believe his plan violates any basic conservative ideals. Instead, he equates the higher royalty rates paid for online radio to a tax.

"I don’t think lowering the so-called tax is something conservatives would normally be opposed to," Chaffetz said.

A House Judiciary subcommittee highlighted the policy fight in a hearing Wednesday.

Chaffetz’s bill would not only put online radio in line with the government royalty rates set for satellite and cable radio, but also make members of the Copyright Royalty Board presidential appointees who would have to be confirmed by the Senate. The three-member board is now picked by the librarian of Congress.

The measure is championed by Pandora, the largest online radio company, and traditional radio broadcasters, many of whom also stream online. That includes Craig Hanson, president of Utah-based Simmons Radio, which operates 12 stations including X96 and U92 in the Salt Lake Valley.

"We are willing to compete," Hanson told The Salt Lake Tribune, "but I think we can’t have a double standard."

story continues below
story continues below

Hanson estimated his business spends up to 10 percent of its net revenue on royalties for songs played over the public airwaves, but 30 percent and higher for songs streamed online, a rate determined by the number of listeners.

He calls the disparity between online radio royalties and those paid by cable or satellite distributors "grossly unfair" and blamed them for limiting growth in online radio.

At the hearing, Chaffetz made the same point, noting that MTV, Rolling Stone and Yahoo tried online radio services, but couldn’t make money. He blamed the rate structure.

"Technically, we have the youngest congressional district in the country," said Chaffetz, referring to Utah’s 3rd Congressional District, which he represents. "And the younger generation is demanding Internet radio. Unfortunately, the financial model just doesn’t work, but we’ll get it there."

He said growth in online radio fostered by his bill would greatly offset any reduction in royalty rates.

"This would be a better, more fair way to make sure that artists get paid," Chaffetz told The Tribune.

Chaffetz began listening to Pandora about two years ago after his 15-year-old daughter showed him how to use the site, which allows listeners to pick a favorite performer and then delivers songs from similar artists. Chaffetz lately has set up Pandora stations for Foster the People and Frank Sinatra, he said.

He’s a strong supporter of Pandora, which has a free, advertising-supported option, or a subscription plan. Subcommittee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., also noted he uses Pandora and may be open to "harmonizing" the royalty rates.

But the top Republican and Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee oppose the bill, highlighting the difficult path facing Chaffetz’s legislation, which is co-sponsored by Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo.

Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, sides with conservatives such as Norquist, arguing that Congress should stop requiring "compulsory" royalty licenses that inhibit a free market.

Ranking Member John Conyers, D-Mich., is fighting the bill because of its impact on the pay for artists, agreeing with a coalition of musicians from Pink Floyd to CeeLo Green.

Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.