Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Salt Lake County cuts barely dent proposed tax hike
Salt Lake County » Average homeowner’s property tax would rise $59 a year instead of $64 under mayor’s plan.
First Published Nov 27 2012 10:24 pm • Last Updated Nov 28 2012 08:17 am

Salt Lake County Council members looked everywhere for ways to cut Mayor Peter Corroon’s proposed 2013 budget and its 17.5 percent tax increase for countywide services.

But after dissecting the $788 million budget for nearly three weeks, the most the Republican-majority council could cut Tuesday from Democrat Corroon’s budget was about $2.5 million.

At a glance

2013 budget

Salt Lake County’s tentative 2013 budget, as adopted Tuesday by the County Council, would:

» Require a 16.2 percent property tax increase to fund countywide services, down from Mayor Peter Corroon’s proposed 17.5 percent increase.

» Cost the average homeowner about $59 more per year, down from the mayor’s $64 plan

» Completely restore wage cuts county employees took in 2009 because of the recession, but would not restore the county’s 2 percent contribution to their 401(k) plans.

» Include two sizable projects not in the mayor’s budget — $1 million for the Living Planet Aquarium in Draper and $250,000 for an underpass serving Dimple Dell Park in Sandy.

» Dropped nearly $500,000 in funding in Corroon’s budget for a new-media center at Salt Lake Community College.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

That would lower the proposed property-tax increase to 16.2 percent. For the owner of a $238,000 home, the county’s median value, the council’s tentative budget would mean a $59-a-year tax hike. The mayor’s budget would have increased taxes on that home by $64.

"We appreciate that this was a very difficult budget," said Deputy Mayor Nichole Dunn, who was representing Corroon when the council approved the tentative budget about 8:45 p.m. after 10 hours of poring through line items. "It showed the mayor presented a light, lean budget."

But one with a tax increase nonetheless. And that had council members wondering how many irate taxpayers may show up at the County Government Center on Dec. 11 for a 6 p.m. public hearing on the tax hike.

Prepare for plenty, warned longtime Councilman/Commissioner Randy Horiuchi, regaling the council with a war story of an encounter with a big tax-protest crowd.

Employees bore the brunt of the council’s cuts.

While the council agreed with the mayor’s plan to return the final 1.75 percent of wage cuts enacted at the start of the recession (2.75 percent overall), it voted 5-4 along party lines not to restore a 2 percent county contribution to employees’ 401(k) plans.

"We’re not reneging on our promise," said Republican Councilman Steve DeBry, contending the improving-but-still-shaky economy had not provided the county with enough revenue to restore the employees’ compensation package fully.

"We promised them based on the [financial] numbers coming in, and the numbers are still not there," he said. "We have to draw the line and make cuts somewhere, based on what we’re staring at with the public" in terms of the proposed tax increase.


story continues below
story continues below

The council also removed another $500,000 from a wellness program that provided financial incentives for county employees to follow healthy lifestyles, and thus reduce the demands on health insurance programs and the premiums paid by both the county and its workers.

The only other major cut was a $500,000 drop in information technology funding.

When it came time to vote on the budget and the revised tax increase proposal, Republican Chairman David Wilde and his conservative colleague Richard Snelgrove voted against it because the remaining tax increase was too high.

They were joined in opposition by Democrats Arlyn Bradshaw and Jim Bradley, who felt the council’s alterations went too far with too little reward. Said Bradley: "You really have to be fair to the employees. We have an opportunity to restore [their compensation] as we said we would. Now’s the exact time to do that."

But the other five council members voted for the overall budget, setting the tax increase at 16.2 percent heading into the Dec. 11 public hearing.

The tenor of the day was set early when the council started going through the mayor’s recommendation to hire 38 new full-time employees.

This was a place where Wilde and Snelgrove felt they could trim expenses and reduce the proposed tax increase. But they were voted down repeatedly after department heads convinced the majority of council members that these workers were needed — from irrigation specialists who could reduce water usage in parks to an early case resolution team in the District Attorney’s Office.

All were hired, to the chagrin of Wilde, referring to himself and Snelgrove as "The Grinch and Scrooge."

But they will have a chance to make further cuts before the budget is finalized on Dec. 13. The council may not exceed the 16.2 percent increase advertised in legal notices about the Dec. 11 public hearing, but it can make changes that reduce that tax hike.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.