Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Lee, Santorum oppose U.N. treaty on disabilities

First Published Nov 26 2012 04:30 pm • Last Updated Mar 06 2013 11:34 pm

Washington • Sen. Mike Lee joined forces with former presidential candidate Rick Santorum on Monday to oppose a United Nations treaty that they fear will usurp parents’ rights to choose how to educate disabled children.

"Our concerns with this convention have nothing to do with any lack of concern for the rights of persons with disabilities," Lee said. "They have everything to do with protecting U.S. sovereignty, protecting the interests of parents in the United States and the interests of families."

At a glance

United Nations disabilities treaty

To read the U.N.’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, go to http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Lee — who is also backed by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C. — took up the fight in a news conference following complaints by the Home School Legal Defense Association and conservatives that ratifying the U.N.’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities would allow the federal government to force parents with special needs children to enroll those kids in public schools.

The treaty’s defenders say it will would help protect the rights of American and other nations’ disabled citizens, who in some parts of the world face discrimination and mistreatment.

The treaty’s detractors say the language is overly broad, and the Republican platform adopted at the party’s national convention opposed it.

"There are some very, very troubling provisions that could open up Pandora’s Box that could directly affect many families in America, particularly with children who have disabilities," Santorum said, with his youngest daughter Bella, who suffers from a rare genetic disorder, starting to cry at his side.

President Barack Obama signed the treaty in 2009 but sent it only this May to the Senate where it’s been held up by conservatives worried that it would hand over too much power to the United Nations. The fears extend to hypothetical scenarios in which the international group would decide how many disabled parking stalls are reserved at churches, enshrine abortion and gay rights and force homeowners to install wheelchair ramps.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, also says he has concerns with the treaty and joined 35 other senators in a letter opposing any ratification during the lame-duck session.

"Senator Hatch supports the treaty’s general goal of advancing the rights and opportunities of persons with disabilities," said Hatch spokesman Matt Harakal, "but he does not support the means that the treaty uses to achieve that goal out of concern that the treaty could jeopardize American sovereignty."

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee in July agreed to join the convention on a 13-6 vote, with three Republicans agreeing to the treaty and six, including Lee, opposed.

story continues below
story continues below

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry said in a July hearing on the treaty that it would extend protections and liberties to Americans when traveling abroad as well as to disabled members of the military. There’s no downside to ratifying it, Kerry said.

"The United States is already a leader in domestic disability rights protection," Kerry said. "Joining the convention will provide a critical tool as we work with other countries to advocate what they follow and hopefully that they will follow our lead and ensure that people with disabilities are free to live and work and travel wherever they want."

Kerry also noted that in the developing world, people with disabilities face indignities and prejudices on a daily basis and backing the treaty would strengthen the United States’ cause in pushing for higher standards.


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.