Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | The Salt Lake Tribune) Merrill Cook files a petition at the Salt Lake County Clerk's office Tuesday to put measure on 2012 ballot for penalizing companies for hiring undocumented workers and geting rid of HB 116.
Utah’s top court throws out challenge to initiative law
Lawsuit » Merrill Cook says he’ll turn to lower court in his push to make E-Verify mandatory.
First Published Jul 03 2012 07:49 pm • Last Updated Sep 06 2012 07:06 pm

The Utah Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit that claimed shortening the time frame for gathering signatures tied to voter turnout in a presidential election is an unreasonable burden.

In a brief written statement in the ruling, Chief Justice Matthew Durrant said Merrill Cook could still seek relief in 3rd District Court.

Photos
Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The lawsuit centered around Cook’s group Citizens Aligned to Secure Utah’s Prosperity. That group had attempted to get an initiative on the ballot that would require businesses to use an electronic verification system —commonly known as E-Verify — to determine if a person was eligible to work in the United States.

Cook’s group had been gathering signatures in Salt Lake County since June 2011 and appeared to end up about 5,000 short before the April deadline had passed.

But Cook had argued before the Utah Supreme Court last week that the restrictions under a law signed by Gov. Gary Herbert in March 2011 were unfair. He said requiring them to gather signatures totaling 10 percent of the voter turnout for a presidential election was more difficult than gathering 10 percent of turnout for a gubernatorial election, as the law previously allowed.

In the last presidential election, 971,185 votes were cast. In the last gubernatorial election in 2010, there were 653,274 votes cast.

The law also tightened the allotted time to gather signatures — 316 days under the current law compared to about three years before Herbert signed the bill, SB165. Cook said the short time frame, coupled with collecting them in bad weather, was burdensome for most volunteer signature gatherers, a group that tends to be elderly.

Thom Roberts, assistant attorney general, argued last week that the case shouldn’t have been filed to the Supreme Court but to Utah’s 3rd District Court.

Cook said his group would file the lawsuit in district court within the next few days.


story continues below
story continues below

dmontero@sltrib.com

Twitter: @davemontero



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.