Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Power plant pollution ranks high in Utah, the West

Although emissions of nitrogen oxide remain high, air-quality official says state has made solid strides in cleaning up other pollutants.

First Published May 24 2012 03:09 pm • Last Updated Aug 28 2012 11:36 pm

A new inventory of power plant pollution shows Utah plants — like those nationwide — are making strides in cleaning up emissions but could do better.

For instance, while Utah is ranked 28th for its electricity output from among more than 3,400 plants nationally, according to the Government Accountability Office, plants in the state ranked sixth worst for nitrogen oxides. NOX, as they are typically called, contribute to all of the major types of pollution the state is trying to control: wintertime PM 2.5, ground-level ozone and haze that obscures national park vistas.

At a glance

Power production and pollution

The Government Accountability Office looked at 3,443 U.S. electric plants that burned fossil fuels, such as coal and natural gas, in 2010. Combined, the plants produced 2.8 billion megawatts of electricity — 39.2 million in Utah.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

According to GAO’s tally, Utah’s plants emit 3.13 pounds of NOX for each megawatt of energy produced. North Dakota, at the top of the list, produces 7.64 pound per megawatt, and other states overseen by the Denver region of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado and Montana — are all in the nation’s top 11 for NOX.

Jeremy Nichols, of the Colorado-based WildEarth Guardians, said the results illustrate how plants in the West lag on these emissions controls. He noted that the problem can be corrected with tried-and-true retrofits.

"We’re running up against the reality here that our fleet — and Utah is an example — that we need to do a lot more to reduce NOX emissions to reduce haze," he said.

The EPA last month told Utah regulators that more needs to be done to reduce NOX in the state’s regional haze plan.

And Rocky Mountain Power has spent $1.4 billion on pollution controls to comply with Clean Air Act limits, with about $1 billion more in upgrades planned in the coming decade.

By contrast, the Intermountain Power Plant near Delta is a big plant that has not been required so far to cut its NOX emissions under recent Clean Air Act changes, noted Bryce Bird, director of Utah’s Division of Air Quality.

"Without a [regulatory] trigger," Bird said, "we don’t have a mechanism to require a retrofit."

Meanwhile, Bird notes that Utah plants have made solid strides in some areas. He pointed to sulfur dioxide, another pollutant counted in the GAO report, that is low in Utah and the rest of the West thanks to the Regional Haze Rule.

story continues below
story continues below

Utah plants produce 1.10 pounds of sulfur dioxide per megawatt hour of electricity, according to GAO. That’s less than one-eighth the sulfur pollution from plants in New Hampshire and Ohio at the top of the nationwide list.

The GAO did its inventory at the request of Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., and chairman of a Senate Environment and Public Works subcommittee.

In a letter describing its findings, the agency drew the link between aging facilities and pollution.

"Older electricity-generating units — those that began operating in or before 1978 — provided 45 percent of electricity from fossil fuel units in 2010 but produced a disproportionate share of emissions, both in aggregate and per unit of electricity generated," the GAO reported, noting that 93 percent of the electricity produced by older fossil-fuel units in 2010 was generated by coal-fired plants.

"For each unit of electricity generated, older units collectively emitted about 3.6 times as much sulfur dioxide, 2.1 times as much nitrogen oxides, and 1.3 times as much carbon dioxide as newer units."

An EPA spokeman said the agency is still reviewing the GAO report.

"It is important to note that the New Source Review program [under the nation’s clean-air law] was not designed to prompt retrofits of older plants," EPA commented in an email. "It is a pre-construction permitting program designed to ensure that newly built facilities do not worsen air quality or slow progress toward clean air."

Tim Wagner, of the Utah Sierra Club, had a different take.

"The fact that IPP can continue to emit these high levels of nitrogen oxides but no regulatory measure exists that allows us to do anything about it simply indicates that we not only have a pollution problem," said Wagner, "we have a political problem."

fahys@sltrib.comTwitter: judyfutah

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.