Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Tribune File Photo) Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, says he hasn't been contacted by investigators looking into the John Swallow scandal.
Lee may vote against Utah judicial nominee

Confirmation fight » Lee hasn’t decided whether he’ll continue his protest against Obama nominees in case of Utah nominee David Nuffer.

First Published Mar 13 2012 04:06 pm • Last Updated Mar 13 2012 11:43 pm

Washington • Sen. Mike Lee hinted Tuesday he might vote against a judicial nominee from his own state — a nominee that he supports — out of frustration with Majority Leader Harry Reid’s move to force confirmation votes on a series of federal court hopefuls.

Lee has waged a lonely war against all of President Barack Obama’s federal nominees after the White House used a controversial recess appointment to install the head of a new consumer-watchdog agency while the Senate was technically in session.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The Utah Republican wouldn’t say Tuesday whether he would vote for or against Magistrate David Nuffer, who has been nominated to fill a vacancy in the Utah federal district, which has been labeled a "judicial emergency" by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

"Because of the issues I’ve got with the president’s unconstitutional abuse of the recess-appointment power, I’ve acknowledged that I’ll be voting differently," Lee said just off the Senate floor. "But I have not made a practice of announcing in advance of any one vote how I’m going to vote."

Lee said he supports Nuffer — the nominee was approved unanimously by the Senate Judiciary Committee — but objects to the Senate majority leader’s effort to push through 17 judicial picks, including Nuffer.

"He should have had a vote months ago," Lee said. "I don’t know why he hasn’t, but Senator Reid controls the floor."

The office of Reid, a Nevada Democrat, did not respond to a request for comment, but White House Council Kathy Ruemmler said in a conference call that opposition for opposition’s sake and not for reasonable objections was "frankly ridiculous."

"This literally could be done in a matter of minutes, and it should be done. There’s no reason it can’t be done," Ruemmler said.

The White House’s lawyer added that concern about recess appointments is a separate issue from that of judicial nominations.

"What we’re talking about here is the federal courts and the third branch of government and the responsibility of both other branches of government to ensure that those seats are filled," she said.

story continues below
story continues below

Lee blasted Reid’s move in a statement this week, calling it a "political stunt" to distract Americans from the "Democrats’ legislative failures."

"His sudden interest in judicial nominations is a desperate attempt to draw attention away from his party’s failure to address our nation’s economic emergencies," Lee said.

Lee has been joined by a few senators in voting against administration nominees. Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said recently he would follow Lee’s lead and object to each and every judicial nominee until Obama pulls back his recess appointments.

"Unless he revokes his unprecedented recess appointments that defied the constitutional role of Congress, I don’t intend to support any of his judicial nominees this year," DeMint told McClatchy Newspapers last week.

Many Republicans, though, including Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, have cautioned that blanket opposition to all nominees as a form of protest is going too far.


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.