Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Lawmakers, Salt Lake City reach truce on anti-idling ordinance

Clean air » Compromise will allow local governments to enforce clean-air initiatives.

First Published Mar 06 2012 06:53 pm • Last Updated Mar 06 2012 11:37 pm

The Legislature and Salt Lake City declared a truce of sorts on Tuesday over a bill once designed to thwart the city’s ban on excessive car idling.

Sen. Ben McAdams, D-Salt Lake City, made an amendment to HB104, which he said was a compromise worked out between the city and Rep. Wayne Harper, R-West Jordan, the bill’s sponsor.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

He said it will allow cities to have anti-idling ordinances. But it will allow enforcement on private property only if it is open to the general public — and not in places such as private driveways.

Also, it would exempt enforcement in such places as approaches to drive-through windows of restaurants or banks, as long as they post signs warning drivers about time limits for idling.

The bill would allow minor fines, similar to parking fines.

"I think this appropriately balances the justifiable need to respect private property rights but also provide for the ability of local jurisdictions to regulate and enforce through educational measures things that may be detrimental to public health," McAdams said.

With the amendments, the Senate voted 28-0 to give preliminary approval of the bill, and move it to a final vote in the Senate.

Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker testified against the bill in an earlier committee hearing, saying it was an attempt to trample a local government’s rights to do what its residents want. He said Salt Lake City has a different mindset than other parts of Utah and a city should be allowed to regulate based on its population’s wishes.

However, Harper argued cities are political subdivisions of the state, and the state has the responsibility to act if cities overstep their bounds in ways inconsistent with state policy. He said the anti-idling ordinance did just that.




Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.