Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Tribune File Photo) A package of bills headed toward final passage in the Legislature seeks to turn tens of millions of acres of federal lands over to the state. The file photo is of Arch Canyon, an area in consideration for wilderness protection, in San Juan County.
Public lands bills advance over Dems’ objections

States’ rights » Package of proposals demand federal government to give Utah control of lands.

First Published Mar 06 2012 04:45 pm • Last Updated Mar 06 2012 11:37 pm

The Senate gave preliminary approval Tuesday to a package of bills demanding that the federal government give Utah control of most public lands in the state by the end of 2014, or face a lawsuit.

"The Legislature demands that the federal government transfer the title of the public lands within the Utah borders that were agreed to in 1896 when Utah became a state," said Sen. Margaret Dayton, R-Orem, reading part of the legislation to the Senate.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Supporters say the federal government promised to give Utah those lands in the law that made it a state, but reneged.

Opponents counter that such an interpretation is a misreading of the statehood-era promises by Utah to forever relinquish claims to federal lands.

The Senate voted 19-7 to send HJR3 to a final vote — which demands the lands. It also voted 22-7 to have a final vote on HB148, which sets up mechanisms to sue if the demands are not met. The seven Democrats in the Senate were the only members to oppose the bills.

The Senate amended HB148 to remove national parks and monuments in the state from the lands that it is demanding. Sen. Wayne Niederhauser, R-Sandy, said the legislation now seeks only lands controlled by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest service that are not formal wilderness, parks or monuments.

Sen. John Valentine, R-Orem, an attorney, said he believes this approach is the first scheme for obtaining the federal lands that he believes has a real chance of success. "I think it has sound constitutional principles behind it," he said.

However, Senate Minority Leader Ross Romero, D-Salt Lake City, noted that the Legislature’s own attorneys put a "constitutional note" on the bills saying they are likely unconstitutional and "that it will engage us in a legal battle with the federal government, and ultimately we are likely to lose in that endeavor."

Romero said pursuing a lawsuit that is likely simply to waste time, effort and taxpayer money "is not the best policy."




Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.