Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
House OKs drug-testing for assistance recipients
HB155 » Measure would set requirement for people getting cash assistance from state.
First Published Mar 01 2012 07:52 pm • Last Updated Mar 01 2012 11:39 pm

People receiving government cash assistance could have to submit to drug testing in order to receive benefits, according to the sponsor of a bill that passed through the House Thursday.

The measure, HB155, passed 62-10, and now goes to the Senate.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

It’s sponsor, Rep. Brad Wilson, R-Kaysville, said the measure addresses the safety net for people who fall on hard times but ensures those who apply for the money also are attempting to get a job and work — which means they can’t be doing drugs.

"I want to be clear … we are not going to prevent folks from getting benefits unless they refuse to go into treatment or they refuse to execute the treatment to get clean," he said.

The measure requires recipients of Utah’s Family Employment Program to fill out a questionnaire and, if suspicions arise that applicants are using drugs, they take a drug test. If drug tests come up positive, they are then required to undergo treatment.

Refusal to fill out the 30-minute questionnaire or take the drug test would result in no cash benefits being distributed to the applicant, who then would be ineligible for 90 days. A second refusal would impose a one-year wait for benefit eligibility.

Rep. Mark Wheatley, D-Murray, was concerned that the bill was based on the assumption that poor people were using drugs — a charge Wilson rebutted by saying only about 10 percent of those applying for the benefits are drug abusers.

Wilson said it was meant as a way for earlier detection of people who might be on a pathway to drug abuse.

"The drug use is an obstacle for getting off drugs and getting of welfare," Wilson said.

Minority Leader David Litvack, D-Salt Lake City, opposed the measure and said the assessment of care needed wasn’t addressed in the measure.


story continues below
story continues below

He also said he thought the bill would prove more expensive than the $169,100 fiscal note indicated.

"I think pragmatically, this will be challenging," Litvack said.

dmontero@sltrib.com

Twitter: @davemontero



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.