Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Scott Sommerdorf | Tribune file photo) Rep. Paul Ray, R-Clearfield, believes local police sometimes abuse their discretion to charge disorderly conduct for the open carrying of firearms. The House agreed Tuesday, passing a bill that would prohibit such charges unless a person showed other incriminating behavior. HB49 now goes to the Senate.
House passes bill that would stop citations for carrying guns openly

Lawmaker doesn’t know why police won’t support his proposal, which passed 50-21.

First Published Feb 21 2012 06:38 pm • Last Updated Feb 22 2012 10:18 am

A measure that would strip local municipalities of the ability to cite civilians with disorderly conduct charges for simply carrying a weapon openly in public passed in the House Tuesday, despite a long floor debate that stoked fears it would hamper police from suppressing potential threats.

The measure, HB49, passed 50-21.

At a glance

HB49, firearms revisions

What the bill says » “The otherwise lawful possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, whether visible or concealed, without additional behavior and circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe the firearm or other dangerous weapon was carried or possessed unlawfully or with criminal intent, does not constitute” disorderly conduct.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Rep. Paul Ray, R-Clearfield, has been fighting for the bill for weeks, trying to get law enforcement to back it. But he was never able to ultimately get the Fraternal Order of Police or a majority of state police chiefs to sign off on the proposal.

"I wish I knew the real reason," Ray said on the floor when asked why police associations haven’t backed it.

Kelly Atkinson, a lobbyist with the FOP, has said that his group’s membership was "deeply divided" on the bill — with some saying it’s a reinforcement of gun rights while others worry it will create more danger for police on the streets.

Ray has repeatedly said his bill is not an open-carry law, but instead is a bill that stops local municipalities from imposing their own restrictive gun laws that trump state law. He said local police have been using the disorderly-conduct charge as a tool for restricting gun rights.

In April, a man arrested at the University Mall in Orem was found guilty of disorderly conduct for carrying a semi-automatic weapon on him — along with a visible, holstered pistol. Philip Taylor argued he was within his rights to carry the guns, but he was fined $500 and placed on one-year probation for the offense, which was reported when an anonymous witness called police to report him.

Rep. Mikel Noel, R-Kanab, said anything that would restrict a person from having a firearm on them in an effort to protect themselves was misguided and that Ray’s bill ensured Utah residents’ constitutional rights.

"It actually goes back to who is responsible for your safety?" Noel said. "Who is responsible for the safety of your family? The first person that is responsible is you."

But Rep. Brian King, D-Salt Lake City, opposed the proposal — bringing up the Trolley Square massacre where an armed gunman walked into the downtown shopping mall in 2007 and killed five people before he was shot dead by police.

story continues below
story continues below

King said Ray’s bill went too far.

"I question whether we should be putting in statute that you can open carry anywhere, anytime," King said. "I don’t know if there is a need for this bill. I think this may restrict our law enforcement agencies’ ability to react."

Ray said the bill didn’t restrict police from questioning a person walking around with weapons — it just removed their ability to file disorderly-conduct charges because some municipalities don’t like lax gun rules.

Rep. Chris Herrod, R-Provo, said he was "saddened" that the bill even had to come up, saying he was weary of the state passing laws that local governments seemed to openly disobey.

"They don’t like the law and so they go around it," Herrod said.

The bill will move to the Senate where President Michael Waddoups said he expected it to get a vigorous hearing in committee, and, if it moved from there, a strong debate on the floor. Waddoups said he hadn’t read the bill yet, but said there would be members in his body who would be troubled by law enforcement’s chilly reception to HB49. But he also thought the Second Amendment right to carry a gun might also carry the day.

"Law enforcement wants to outgun the other side — and I understand that," Waddoups said. "But private citizens shouldn’t be deprived of the right to defend themselves."

Waddoups was the original sponsor of many of Utah’s concealed-weapons laws, including the 1995 statute that put the burden on government for showing why someone shouldn’t be granted a concealed-carry license rather than, as had previously been the case, requiring the individual to demonstrate the need for such protection.

dmontero@sltrib.com Twitter: @davemontero

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.