Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Al Hartmann | Tribune file photo) The proposed pipeline project would take water from Lake Powell in southeastern Utah and move it to populations centers in southwestern Utah. In this file photo, fishing boat heads up Sevenmile Canyon at Lake Powell.
Utah House panel backs bill to finance Powell pipeline
Water » Critics fear earmark would set unwise precedent.
First Published Feb 17 2012 10:47 am • Last Updated Feb 18 2012 10:11 am

A House committee advanced a bill Friday to finance water projects, including the $1.2 billion Lake Powell pipeline, by earmarking an estimated $74 million in sales taxes for a loan fund starting in 2016.

HB174, sponsored by Rep. Patrick Painter, R-Nephi, has drawn the ire of conservationists, budget watchdogs and the Utah Taxpayers Association, and some who voted for it Friday morning said they did so only to allow a full debate on the House floor.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The House Revenue and Taxation Committee passed the bill 9-5.

A smaller state revolving-loan fund has made Utah’s growth possible for the past half-century, Utah Division of Water Resources Director Dennis Strong said, but now more is needed. Statewide projects big and small will need $15 billion during the next 20 years, he said, and getting it means healthy economic growth.

"The return to the state and the coffers of the state is significant," he said.

Critics believe the Washington County Water Conservancy District, whose Lake Powell plans will cost more than $1 billion of that, needs to price water appropriately to boost conservation before asking the state for help. Property taxes cover more than half the district’s bills, effectively subsidizing water rates that otherwise might rise to encourage less lawn sprinkling.

"We need to pay for what we use, pay adequate water prices and conserve," Citizens for Dixie’s Future Director Christi Nuffer told the committee.

The bill would earmark 15 percent of the growth in statewide sales-tax revenues for the loan fund, which St. George residents or other recipients might repay through construction impact fees or taxes. The set-aside of new revenues, on top of a 30 percent growth earmark that the Legislature approved for roads last year, caused some lawmakers of both parties to balk.

Painter repeatedly has stressed that the earmark is only for growth in sales revenues — not dipping into existing budgets — but skeptics have noted that all government services will need more funds as the population grows.

"That did concern me a lot with the many pressing needs we have with the state," said Rep. Merlynn Newbold, R-South Jordan, who voted against the bill.


story continues below
story continues below

"It’s a fundamentally unwise public policy for us as a Legislature to seek to tie the hands of future Legislatures," said Rep. Brian King, D-Salt Lake City.



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.