Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Lee wants to restrict abortions in D.C.

Abortion » District of Columbia’s House delegate calls the move anti-democratic.

First Published Feb 14 2012 04:53 pm • Last Updated May 24 2012 11:35 pm

Washington • Sen. Mike Lee has introduced legislation that would ban abortions in the District of Columbia for women who have been pregnant longer than 20 weeks.

The bill, introduced Monday, would add D.C. to a list of five conservative states that have a similar threshold, the point some doctors say an unborn child has developed the ability to feel pain. The states are Idaho, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Alabama.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"Protecting unborn children from experiencing pain should not be controversial," said Lee.

But like most aspects of the abortion debate, it is controversial.

Some doctors argue about when a fetus has the nerve growth to feel pain, with estimates ranging from 20 to 28 weeks of gestation.

D.C.’s nonvoting House delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton slammed Lee’s bill. Sidestepping the medical argument, she accused Lee of pushing a test case for a nationwide campaign for more restrictive abortion laws at the expense of local control.

"Senator Lee is trying to undemocratically usurp local authority outside his own state in violation of every founding principle of local control," she said. "And at the same time to introduce the idea that basic constitutional rights depend on where a citizen lives."

Norton said she would urge pro-abortion rights groups to fight Lee’s bill and a similar piece of legislation in the House.

Lee called Norton’s claims "absurd" and defended his focus on the nation’s capital, which Congress directly oversees.

He said he would oppose a national version of his legislation, arguing that states should make such laws.


story continues below
story continues below

"I don’t believe Congress has the authority to tell the states what they can and cannot prohibit to allow in this area," he said.

Lee would like to see Utah’s Legislature adopt a similar law, saying he thinks it is "good policy," though he said that’s a decision left up to state lawmakers. So far, in the middle of the state’s 2012 session, no state lawmaker has introduced such a bill.

mcanham@sltrib.com

Twitter: @mattcanham



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.