Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
House committee OKs ban on DUI checkpoints
HB140 » Police chiefs say the checkpoints provide deterrence.
First Published Feb 10 2012 08:38 pm • Last Updated Feb 10 2012 11:31 pm

Law enforcement officials and drunken driving opponents argued Friday that Utah should maintain the practice of setting up checkpoints to catch DUI drivers on the streets.

But a House committee disagreed, approving HB140 sponsored by Rep. David Butterfield, R-Logan, who made the case that the checkpoints infringe on Utahns’ civil liberties, are an ineffective way of catching drunken drivers and should be done away with.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

"We have to decide what is the balance between effective law enforcement … and protecting constitutional and civil rights," Butterfield told the House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee. "That’s why we’re gathered here. That’s what we do."

Eleven states have done away with DUI checkpoints, he said.

Butterfield met resistance from Salt Lake County Sheriff Jim Winder, who said people were dying in droves at Little Sahara and near Lake Powell and the Cottonwood canyons before law enforcement started putting up checkpoints at key, high-traffic times.

"There’s a reason the TSA [Transportation Security Administration] checks people coming onto planes … because wandering around an airport doesn’t quite cut the mustard," said Winder, speaking on behalf of the state’s sheriffs.

Taking away checkpoints, Winder said, would deny law enforcement a tool it uses that has been deemed constitutional by the Utah and U.S. supreme courts.

Butterfield also argued that saturation patrols generate significantly more DUI arrests than checkpoints, and require less manpower.

"Saturation patrols do result in more arrests," agreed Layton police Chief Terry Keefe, representing the Utah Chiefs of Police Association. "I don’t think there’s any argument on that point … but the deterrent value of sobriety or DUI check points allows us to stop the problem before it starts."

The bill passed the committee on an 8-5 vote. Reps. Lee Perry and Richard Greenwood, current and former Utah Highway Patrol officers, respectively, voted against the ban.

story continues below
story continues below

It now goes to the full House for consideration, but could meet even more resistance in the Senate, which has traditionally supported tough DUI enforcement.

"At the end of the day we’re on the same team. We want to see our highways as safe as they can be and DUI drivers off the road," said Butterfield. "It’s up to us as legislators to balance that requirement with the need to protect civil liberties and put our limited resources into the most effective tool."

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.