Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Al Hartmann | Tribune File Photo Saratoga Springs Mayor Mia Love.
Mia Love: Budget hawk or big spender?
Politics » Saratoga Springs taxes and spending shot up, but she says growth is reason.
First Published Feb 08 2012 06:56 pm • Last Updated Feb 08 2012 10:39 pm

In launching her bid for Congress, Saratoga Springs Mayor Mia Love hit all the conservative notes ­— shrink government, cut taxes and grow the economy.

But her record as mayor and before that a member of the City Council tells, on its face, a different story: a property tax rate that has grown considerably in recent years and a city budget that shot up by nearly 50 percent during her tenure as mayor.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Love says it was all part of the growing pains for a town whose massive building spurt ran headfirst into a collapse in the economy. But tough steps were taken to cut spending and put the city on sound footing, and she says the record shows her conservative credentials.

"I’m a very big voice for reining in spending and saying, ‘I don’t want to see it if it’s not a government role, and I don’t want to see it if it’s not sustainable,’ " Love said in an interview.

The mayor’s record on taxes and spending, largely unknown to the Republican delegates and voters she will be courting in the coming weeks, will be a major selling point and test in her bid for the GOP nomination in the 4th Congressional District.

Love was sworn in as a member of the City Council in 2004 in the town of just more than 3,000. Five years later, the population had exploded to 16,000-plus. New homes popped up around the city, and the budget and full-time staff, paid by the flood of building permit revenue, swelled.

But when the housing bubble burst, Saratoga Springs was hit especially hard. In 2008, facing a budget shortfall of more than $3 million, the council faced an option of a 400 percent tax increase or slashing the budget.

They did a little of both, cutting the budget by about $2 million, laying off eight of the 85 employees and — in the most controversial move — more than doubling the property tax rates, imposing a 116 percent increase.

"When the city was in trouble, we rolled up our sleeves and started to cut everything," Love said.

At the same time, Love said the city hadn’t adjusted its property tax rate since it was incorporated and needed a reliable revenue stream instead of depending on building permits.

story continues below
story continues below

The City Council — including then-Councilwoman Love — voted to raise the tax rate from 0.09 percent to 0.2 percent.

‘Give us all your money’ » Dianne Hales, who lived in Saratoga Springs for more than four years, spoke out against that tax hike at the time.

"I was to the point where I was sick of government and any sort of government thinking all they have to do is raise taxes," said Hales, who moved out of Saratoga Springs last year. "They’ve overspent and done other things, and they think it’s OK to do that. We as American people can’t do that. We can’t go to people and say, ‘Give us all your money because we’ve run out.’ "

Since the 2008 crash, the Saratoga Springs budgets have crept upward again. In the 2009 budget year, the general fund expenses totaled $5.6 million. In the current budget year, they total nearly $9.2 million, a 64 percent increase.

At the same time, property tax rates have crept up to offset declining property value in the city.

Under Utah’s system, the rates can adjust up or down to bring in the same amount of revenue as the prior year without having to go through a truth in taxation hearing.

Saratoga Springs tax rates are now 0.31 percent, making them higher than the neighboring cities of Eagle Mountain, American Fork and Lehi.

Love, who left the City Council and was elected mayor of the city in 2009, said those cities have much higher utility rates and the growing budget reflects the demands of a growing city.

For example, Saratoga Springs now has a justice court that operates off the fines it brings in. There also has been an increase in parks and recreation spending.


Next Page >

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.