Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) A full room listens as the Senate Government Operations and Politicial Subdivisions Committee considers SB51, prohibiting discrimination against gay and transgender residents. It was the first time in five years such a bill has received a public hearing. But SB51 was tabled on a 4-1 vote.
Lawmakers scrap effort to ban anti-gay discrimination

LGBT » Bill gets first Senate hearing in its fifth year.

First Published Feb 03 2012 07:40 pm • Last Updated Apr 11 2012 11:22 pm

Despite strong support in public polls and endorsements from prominent business leaders, lawmakers on Friday snuffed out a statewide effort to ban discrimination against gay and transgender Utahns.

In a 4-2 vote, a Senate committee shelved SB51 after a 90-minute public hearing with a standing-room-only crowd.

At a glance

About the bill

SB51 » Would amend Utah’s fair housing and employment laws to bar discrimination based on a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity or political speech and activity.

Status » Tabled for the 2012 session.

The committee vote

Sen. Luz Robles, the lone Democrat on the Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee, voted against shelving SB51. But some were surprised that Sen. Casey Anderson, a Cedar City Republican, joined her. Anderson said, “there were a lot of reasons to vote against the bill,” but he wanted to give Sen. Ben McAdams, D-Salt Lake City, a chance to amend his bill and address questions raised during Friday’s hearing. Anderson also would have preferred a straight-up-or-down vote on the bill’s merits, instead of a vote to “table.”

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Sen. Ben McAdams, the bill’s sponsor and a Salt Lake City Democrat, said he was disappointed the bill failed but called the hearing a "valuable discussion" and a "huge milestone." This is the fifth year that Democrats have run such a bill but the first year to get a Senate hearing.

This year, the Salt Lake Chamber and executives from Ancestry.com, 1-800-Contacts and eBay have endorsed the measure, saying it would enhance Utah’s reputation as a welcoming place to do business. Nearly three-fourths of Utahns support such a law, according to a recent poll by Dan Jones & Associates.

Already, 14 Utah cities and counties have ordinances that ban housing and employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. McAdams said adding those categories to Utah’s existing anti-discrimination laws, which protect individuals from bias based on race, religion, disability and other characteristics, would make the law consistent statewide.

But members of the Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee raised concerns about frivolous claims and the rights of property owners and employers. They also expressed discomfort with a new provision in the bill that would have protected employees from discrimination based on their political speech and activity.

Sen. Scott Jenkins wondered if the protection would mean any disgruntled employee — including a straight one — could claim he was discharged for being gay.

"Does he have to first prove his sexual orientation?" Jenkins asked. "Whether a person is gay or not ends up being almost a he said, she said."

Clifford Rosky, a University of Utah law professor and board member of Equality Utah, said it wouldn’t matter what the person’s sexual orientation is. The law not only would protect people who are gay or bisexual, but also people who are straight. Those filing complaints would have to prove to the Utah Labor Commission that an employer discriminated based on their sexual orientation — real or perceived.

Gayle Ruzicka, president of the Utah Eagle Forum, spoke against the bill, saying that exemptions for religious organizations should be expanded to include religious people. Although existing anti-discrimination laws exempt owners of four or fewer units, Ruzicka questioned how she would be affected if she owned a 100-unit apartment complex.


story continues below
story continues below

"What if I was renting to singles and wanted I certain standard. I couldn’t say, ‘You’re living a homosexual lifestyle. You cant live here,’" Ruzicka said. "I think I should have the right to do so."

McAdams said allowing bias because of a person’s religious beliefs would undermine state and federal laws that prohibit discrimination.

"If I want to rent only to people of a certain ethnicity [because of my religious beliefs], I can’t do that. That’s discrimination," McAdams said.

Sen. Margaret Dayton, R-Orem, said she was uncomfortable with protections in the bill for political speech and activity. McAdams said the provision was added to show "mutual respect" for those with disagreeing political views that may be religiously motivated. He said it would prevent firing someone for donating money for or against same-sex marriage initiatives, such as California’s Proposition 8.

Rep. Derek Brown, R-Cottonwood Heights, had announced he would co-sponsor SB51, but he did not participate in the hearing. Earlier this week he said he had reservations about the political-activity provision.

After the bill failed, McAdams said that part of the bill became "unwieldy" and he likely will scrap it if he runs the bill again. As a candidate for Salt Lake County mayor, McAdams said he will pass the anti-discrimination "torch" to another legislator if he leaves his Senate post this year.

rwinters@sltrib.com



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.