Who should pay to save Salt Lake City’s ailing trees? | The Salt Lake Tribune
Get news, sports and politics alerts

Click here to manage your alerts
(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Aging sycamores and maple trees on the east bench of Salt Lake City are sick from insects or disease. The city may ask residents to help pay for treating the sick trees. Friday, February 3, 2012
Who should pay to save Salt Lake City’s ailing trees?
Environment » City may ask residents to chip in for a remedy.
First Published Feb 03 2012 03:43 pm • Last Updated Feb 05 2012 08:27 pm

Bug-infested forests, scarring our mountainsides with swaths of red or gray trees, receive more scrutiny. But a similar malady menacing Salt Lake City’s urban forest suddenly has the attention of arborists and politicians alike.

The city’s stately sycamores — along with maples, honeylocusts and other species that canopy streets and give neighborhoods character — are sick.

Photos
At a glance

Fears over SLC’s urban forest

» 5,500 street trees in SLC, many sycamores, are sick.

» City is $350,000 shy for this year’s tree-treatment budget.

» Aging sycamores, maples, honeylocusts and some evergreens suffer from insects or disease.

» City Hall is soliciting feedback online at “Open City Hall” about whether residents should help pay for spraying or let aging trees die to replant.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

And since City Hall doesn’t have enough cash to combat the insects and disease through regular spraying, it may turn to its residents to help pay for a remedy. Tree hugging, it appears, may get more expensive.

"We’ve kind of set this up just by the way we’ve planted these same trees side by side 60 or 70 years ago," explains Bill Rutherford, the city’s urban forester. "We’re starting to run these trees on fumes. They’re gasping right now."

One culprit is age. Like humans, who become more susceptible to disease when they get older, 50-foot London planes, maples and some evergreens are vulnerable. They also have become easy targets for insects, Rutherford notes, since so many "mono-culture" trees are planted tightly in rows, without the diversity of extra greenery operating as a barrier.

"It provides the beautiful arching canopy. It has such wonderful curb appeal," Rutherford says of the trees adorning streets from the Harvard-Yale to Glendale areas. "A lot of people say they selected the neighborhood because of the trees."

But now that 5,500 trees are declining, the city is paying the price for those ornamental plantings.

"Without treatment, the look and feel of our city where these trees are located will change dramatically and will not be recoverable for 20 to 30 years," reads a statement on the city’s online forum "Open City Hall," which raises the prospect of financial aid from property owners.

A single year of treatment will cost $358,000. The budget for insect and disease intervention is $5,000. So without extra money, the forestry workers will only be able to spray 200 trees at a cost of $25 each.

Suggested solutions include:

story continues below
story continues below

• Creating a program for affected homeowners to share the cost of the tree care.

• Coordinating a campaign that refers property owners to private service providers.

• Allowing infested trees to deteriorate, while pruning, removing and replanting as needed.

The let-nature-run-its-course option raises other questions. Should the city ask property owners to pay for some or all of the new trees? And if the city elects to "re-forest," should it plant new species, ones less likely to play host to insects and disease?

City officials say no decision has been made and that raising the topic on their "Open City Hall" online forum is designed simply to solicit feedback.

Yet Mayor Ralph Becker expresses his preference, particularly since the same $175 it takes to plant a 2-inch caliper tree could be used to treat up to seven mature trees.

"The administration believes that some care needs to be given to protect a portion — if not all of the established trees," Open City Hall reads. "The trees are enormously valuable to the associated property. They define neighborhoods, increase property values, beautify homes and communities. Children ride bikes under their canopy, while neighbors rest in their shade. These are assets the city does not want to lose. However, we need your help determining how to pay for their care."

Next Page >


Copyright 2012 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Reader Comments
Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, click the red "Flag" link below it.
See more about comments here.
What are those badges some users have next to their names?


Staying Connected
Jobs
Shopping
Contests and Promotions
Affiliates and Partners