Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Holding Legislature poll on U.S. Senate candidates fails
Politics » Some lawmakers pine for pre-1913 days before popular elections picked senators.
First Published Jan 31 2012 07:19 pm • Last Updated Feb 02 2012 10:11 pm

Legislators apparently are not ready to pretend as though the 17th Amendment is repealed or, at least, watered down.

Sen. Casey Anderson, R-Cedar City, pushed SJR11 to call for a secret-ballot, informal poll of legislators each election year to show the public which Senate candidate they prefer. The bill aimed at giving a nod to the days when state Legislatures — not voters — elected U.S. Senators failed to advance on a tied 3-3 vote Tuesday in the Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Anderson said "1913 is widely considered to be one of the worst years in American history" because of passage of the 17th Amendment that year, which he said hurt the ability of states to hold senators accountable. He said his bill would recreate an important tie between senators and the Legislature he believes should exist, even if it is only advisory.

"It is no surprise there is a large disconnect between Washington, D.C., and the rest of the country when the majority of the dollars raised for each race does not come from the home state but from special interest groups in Washington, D.C.," he said.

Sen. Daniel Thatcher, R-West Valley City, agreed, saying, "The 17th Amendment is directly responsible for every single federal overreach that’s happened in the past 90 years." But he said he would only support the resolution if it took effect after this year, so it would not appear legislators are posturing to support one of the current candidates.

Sen. Margaret Dayton, R-Orem, also supported the resolution, saying it would show "the states have some significance. We’re not just 50 states here to do the clerical bidding of an overreaching federal government." While others did not speak against the legislation, it still failed to achieve the needed votes to proceed.




Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Login to the Electronic Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.