Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Editorial: Does Utah want its liquor business to improve?

Utah drinkers get what they get.

First Published Aug 29 2014 05:11 pm • Last Updated Aug 29 2014 05:11 pm

Customer information, in one form or another, is the backbone of modern marketing. In the old days, executives had only their hunches and experience to figure out where customers are and where they’re headed. Now we live in the age of big data. Customers are researched and tracked in ways never thought imaginable.

So it is a good sign that Utah’s state-run liquor monopoly has reached out to its customers with a survey, and the results of that outreach show the state’s 46 liquor outlets could make several moves that would both improve service and, as a result, produce more tax money for school lunches and other state needs.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

The question, of course, is whether the state really wants to better satisfy its customers, who might just consume more alcohol as a result.

The law that regulates liquor sales in Utah is clear: "Alcoholic product control shall be operated as a public business using sound management principles and practices."

But the same law also says: "The commission and department may not promote or encourage the sale or consumption of alcoholic products."

Those two statements simply are not compatible, so which is it? Does the state use "sound management principles and practices" to better meet its customers’ needs and increase its sales? Or does it ignore the survey’s findings because any accommodations may "promote or encourage the sale or consumption of alcoholic products"?

Anyone who has arrived at a liquor store at 7:02 p.m. knows which argument carries the day.

Want further proof that Utah doesn’t really want to operate liquor stores as a legitimate business? The DABC has to go to the Utah Legislature for a budget increase if it wants to keep stores open later because it would have to pay employees to stay later. DABC could certainly make the case that the increased labor costs are more than offset by increased sales during the added hours, but that argument has never meant much to legislators.

How can any business possibly use "sound management principles and practices" when simply increasing hours requires a political fight?

DABC should be careful about dangling any ideas for improving its service. If the changes recommended by the survey are not made, then such outreach is just punishing customers with false hopes. And that may encourage more drinking.


story continues below
story continues below



Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.