In high school debate we had to prepare to argue both sides of the argument as persuasively as possible, since the luck of the draw determined which point-of-view we’d be assigned in any given contest.
I wish that same approach applied to the editorial boards of the Deseret News and Salt Lake Tribune in relation to the gay-marriage debate. I read both newspapers daily, and find that both are so entrenched in your point-of-view that you seem incapable of even articulating why this matters so much to people on the other side
I wish the Deseret News could show even the slightest empathy to gay families who believe they are living moral lives that are worthy of the dignity of marriage.
And I wish the Tribune could step into the shoes of religious people who feel that speaking up for the traditional definition of marriage is a legitimate expression of free speech deserving of respect.
I personally believe that marriage faces so many challenges in the modern world that we should welcome the addition of a class of generally kind and caring people who aspire to make it part of their lives. In a way that is the ultimate tribute to this sacred covenant in the human experience.
This is my opinion, but at least I try to understand the point of view of those who disagree. I wish our two area newspapers would try to see both sides of the discussion as well.
Salt Lake City
Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.