Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Bloomberg View: World Bank reform proposals worthy but don’t go far enough
First Published Jul 22 2014 10:12 am • Last Updated Jul 22 2014 03:44 pm

There will always be a need for a World Bank, which celebrated a birthday of sorts Tuesday. There is no need for a World Bank with more than 10,000 employees.

President Jim Yong Kim is trying to reform the bank, one of the global financial institutions that emerged from the historic Bretton Woods agreement signed on July 22, 1944. He is getting strong resistance from a rank and file protective of its parking subsidies, business-class travel and generous meal allowances. The greater danger for Kim, however, is that he will be too timid.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Kim is right that the bank’s overarching mission should be to help the 1 billion or so people who subsist on less than $1.25 a day. It can best do so by complementing, not competing with, the private sector.

The bank, which fights poverty by lending to developing countries for roads, schools, dams and other public-works projects, is bloated and bureaucratic. And those aren’t even its biggest problems.

By its own admission, the bank is fighting for relevancy now that many of its customers don’t need it anymore. The developing world’s rising middle class is attracting private capital and reducing the need for countries to borrow from the World Bank. More than $1 trillion a year now flows from the private sector and major philanthropies to developing economies. Official development assistance, by contrast, totals about $125 billion. Last year, the World Bank’s new lending came to less than $35 billion.

In recent months, African countries have issued billions of dollars in government bonds to fund public-works projects. Kenya sold $1.5 billion of Eurobonds to international investors in June — and could have placed five times that amount. The competing development bank announced last week by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa is another sign that the World Bank no longer sits at the center of economic gravity.

Kim, as of this month, is switching the organization from six geographic regions to 14 global practices, or areas of expertise, including public health, energy, agriculture and governance. The idea is that this will encourage more cross-border collaboration — so that an expert in, say, electricity generation could advise any government, whether it’s in Asia or Africa.

Kim also intends to cut $400 million, or 8 percent, from the budget and about 1,000 staff in coming years. At the same time, he is narrowing the bank’s focus to eradicating extreme poverty and raising the incomes of the poorest 40 percent worldwide by 2030.

This is a useful and overdue refocusing. It could be more ambitious still. Where private capital is willing to step in, the bank should step back.

Most important, the bank should rethink its basic approach to financing public projects. In East Africa, the bank is collaborating with other aid groups and the European Union to finance a hydropower project. It will be publicly owned by Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania, but it will be privately operated.

story continues below
story continues below

Of the handful of institutions that emerged from the three-week gathering seven decades ago at New Hampshire’s Mount Washington Hotel, the World Bank has most outlived its purpose. It still has a role to play. But to be truly relevant again, it will have to do more than make changes to its organizational chart.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.