Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Op-ed: It’s time for grizzly bears to come home to the Uintas

By NoaH Greenwald

First Published Jul 03 2014 05:43 pm • Last Updated Jul 03 2014 05:47 pm

Much as it did with the gray wolf, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is moving to remove Endangered Species Act protections for the grizzly bear, beginning with the iconic bears of Yellowstone National Park. But are the bears truly recovered and ready for the state sponsored hunts that are sure to ensue with removal of protection?

As many as 50,000-100,000 grizzly bears once roamed the West, from the coast of California and Cascade Range in Washington and Oregon through the Great Plains, a vast and varied stretch of habitat that included much of Utah and Colorado.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Today there are none of these iconic symbols of the American West left in Utah and Colorado and no more than 1,800 remaining in the lower 48. The sad fact is we’ve hemmed grizzly bears into less than 4 percent of their historic habitat and they’re scattered in a few isolated populations, like Yellowstone and Glacier National Parks, with few chances for genetic exchange.

Grizzly bears deserve better than that. Scientists have identified more than 110,000 square miles in the American West that could potentially accommodate grizzly bears, including Utah’s Uinta Mountains, parts of the Eastern Colorado Plateau and San Juan Mountains in Colorado, the Grand Canyon, the Gila/Mogollon complex in Arizona and New Mexico and the Sierra Nevada in California.

These are places that are away from large population centers, have plenty of prey and enough sprawling landscape for these smart and omnivorous wanderers.

That’s why I just co-authored a legal petition filed this week asking the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to meet its legal and moral responsibility to recover grizzly bears to suitable habitat across their historic range.

Returning bears to these areas could potentially triple the grizzly population in the lower 48 states to as many as 6,000 in genetically stable, connected populations.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service itself admits that the recovery plan developed in 1993 no longer represents the best available science and needs revision. That plan detailed strategies for six areas: Greater Yellowstone, North Continental Divide, Cabinet-Yaak, the Selkirk Mountains, Selway-Bitterroot and the North Cascades. To date, however, progress towards recovery has only been made in the first two areas where roughly 1,500 bears survive. With fewer than 100 bears total, populations in the Cabinet-Yaak and Selkirks are perilously close to extinction, while populations in the Selway-Bitterroot and North Cascades consist of scattered individuals.

Those numbers, coupled with the lack of connectivity between populations, offer no assurance that grizzlies can weather increased pressures from climate change, a growing human population and if protection is lifted, hunting.

Even in Yellowstone, where federal regulators are moving to drop protections first, a growing body of scientific evidence has raised questions about the stability of the iconic bear population.

story continues below
story continues below

The law clearly requires more of us. In passing the Endangered Species Act, Congress insisted that a species must be protected in each "significant portion of its range," even if the species is secure in other portions of its range. This makes clear that along with preventing extinction, the Act implores that we recover species to as much of their historic habitat as possible.

And only by returning grizzly bears to remote stretches of the Southwest, southern Rockies, Sierra Nevada and Cascades can federal biologists make sure that grizzly bears will be around for centuries to come.

They’ve been away for long enough. It’s time for them to come home.

Noah Greenwald directs the endangered species program at the Center for Biological Diversity in Portland, Ore.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.