Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Downes and Nunes: Five myths about disruption

First Published Jun 28 2014 09:59 pm • Last Updated Jun 28 2014 10:05 pm

Writing recently in the New Yorker, historian Jill Lepore contends that the prevailing theory of business change - known as "disruptive innovation" - is grounded in poor research and circular logic. While it’s true that talk of disruption is thrown around carelessly (the meaningless advertising phrase "new and improved!" has been replaced with "disruptive and innovative!"), it’s equally obvious to any teenager with a month-old smartphone that the pace of business disruption is accelerating.

1. Disruptive innovations begin as inferior replacements for existing products.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Harvard business professor Clayton Christensen, the focus of Lepore’s article, argued in his 1997 book, "The Innovator’s Dilemma," that successful companies can be upended by new technologies that first appear as cheaper products with fewer features, but improve quickly and ultimately take over. Think personal computers vs. mainframes.

But not anymore. Our research shows that especially in industries dominated by digital technology, the disruptors now arrive better and cheaper than existing goods, right from the start - think free integrated smartphone navigation apps vs. stand-alone GPS devices. "Disruptive innovation" is increasingly "devastating innovation," or what we call "big bang disruption." Businesses that wait for the disruptor to arrive before figuring out how to incorporate it in their products - as Christensen recommended - are already too late.

Companies can compensate for the increasing pace of change by watching for the early signs of emerging technologies while they’re still in the lab. Then they can start experimenting before it’s too late. Or, almost as good, before their competitors.

2. The further you are from the technology industry, the safer you are from disruption.

It would be comforting if only industries at the center of the information revolution - computing, communications, media, entertainment - felt the pain of disruption.

But with computers getting faster, cheaper and smaller over the past half-century, it has now become cost-effective to embed computing capability in nearly every product or service. Even the most non-digital industries - such as heavy manufacturing, transportation, energy and education - are feeling the pressure of digital technology as entrepreneurs look for the biggest opportunities for disruption.

In health care, for example, cheap sensors, cameras and displays (made cheaper by economies of scale, thanks to the sale of more than 1 billion smartphones and tablets since 2007) are being combined in wearable devices that can track a range of vital signs - baby steps toward giving patients access to their own health information and bringing spiraling medical costs under control.

What is true is that the more regulated an industry, the harder for the disruptors to enter. But those industries - health care, energy and transportation are good examples - are often the most inefficient, making disruption by better and cheaper technology irresistible. And often, when innovators finally break through, the disruption is all the more explosive. Recall how email turned the U.S. Postal Service from a profit center to a financial black hole.


story continues below
story continues below

3. The best innovations come from proprietary R&D.

In the past few years, we’ve seen a wave of new companies - Oculus, WhatsApp, Instagram - acquired for billions of dollars, sometimes before they’ve even launched a commercial product. It’s not as crazy as it sounds.

What these start-ups have in common is that each quickly built a devoted audience of millions of consumers, often by giving away its experimental products and encouraging users to collaborate with developers. Cloud computing, reusable software and globally sourced parts make experimenting easy. Using crowdfunding platforms such as Kickstarter and Indiegogo, early users can even be recruited as funders, voting with real money for the products and services they’d most like to see in industries far from computer hardware and software, including food, clothing and industrial design.

Experimenting in public, of course, gives away the element of surprise that traditional forms of research and development treasure. But in exchange, the entrepreneurs not only build excitement for their future products, they also harness the power of the crowd to get it right - or wrong - quickly, at much lower cost and risk.

One important side effect of this experimentation: It’s a great source of free intelligence for incumbents looking for disruptors coming up fast in their rearview mirrors.

4. Once disruptors gain enough consumers, there’s no way to slow them down.

Markets experiencing deep disruption are often characterized by "winner take all" behavior, with consumers moving as a group to the better, cheaper new products and services they like best. (A series of TV commercials for the new HTC One smartphone tweaks that phenomenon by urging users to go "ask the Internet" rather than just listening to the ads.)

But even if existing companies miss the disruptors’ arrival, they can still slow the inevitable transformation of their business by engaging the legal system. Firms that are constrained in their own ability to innovate by regulatory restrictions, for example, can urge their regulators to force the disruptors to play by the same rules, a strategy that has tripped up start-ups including Uber, Airbnb and Tesla.

Patents and copyrights can also be deployed to delay the impact of disruptive innovation or even bring it to a dead stop. This past week, the Supreme Court ruled that Aereo, a service that allowed users to remotely record over-the-air television programs and replay them later over the Internet, was violating a complex web of TV-related copyright laws. The decision probably marks the end of Aereo’s business.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.