Quantcast
Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Pyle: No prior restraint on the right to vote

By George Pyle

| The Salt Lake Tribune

First Published May 09 2014 03:44 pm • Last Updated May 11 2014 11:43 am

The following is a seriously condensed version of a speech delivered Friday to the annual convention of the Utah League of Women Voters:

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

In the year 2008, a Kenyan socialist with a funny name went and got himself elected president of the United States. He did that by winning the votes of a lot of folks who hadn’t always bothered to vote before, or were too young to have voted in previous elections.

In 2012, the same fellow went and did it again. It was a little more difficult this time, in part because this chosen one hadn’t managed to fix all the problems, new and inherited, that were still pestering the electorate. And in part because the idea of voting in a youngish black man was no longer such a pleasant novelty that it alone served to energize the mostly young, female and minority voters who had turned the previous election in his favor.

But, as before, Barack Obama and his crack team of Internet and social media Jedi made the most of the voter support they did have.

(Why those same people weren’t called upon to set up the Obamacare websites is a puzzle. Probably something to do with federal procurement laws that don’t allow federal agencies to just call up a super-geek pal and get something amazing fired up on short order.)

The Mitt Romney campaign supposedly had a similar voter targeting and motivation operation. But it wasn’t turned on until Election Day, which was months too late. And, even then, it didn’t work.

Which left Utah native Karl Rove to sit in from of the Fox News cameras on Election Night and melt down into a slag heap of denial, anger, bargaining and depression. And poor Mitt and Ann, trapped for months in that same right-wing echo chamber, were left to gracefully handle the acceptance part.

Even before that, though, there were many Republicans who had figured out that a voter-turnout machine, even if it worked, wouldn’t work. Not for a party trying to swim upstream against national demographic trends that are inexorably leaving their base — angry white males and their long-suffering wives — in the minority.

Not only are more blacks and Hispanics voting, so are more single women. And more women are remaining single longer, either because they have a good education and are building careers, or because they don’t have a good education but are still smart enough to realize that most of their marriage prospects would just be another whiney mouth to feed.


story continues below
story continues below

So, instead of motivating their voters, more and more Republicans have turned their attention to discouraging the other party’s voters.

They’ve imposed stricter requirements for registering to vote, or for producing the kind of government-issued photo ID that poor people, young people and retired people are the least likely to have.

One of those voter ID laws, passed in Wisconsin, was smashed on the rocks recently by a federal judge who, after hearing from a roomful of expert witnesses on both sides, concluded that the voter impersonation plague that the law was supposed to address simply does not exist.

In order to do what the Wisconsin Legislature and governor said they were trying to prevent, an unauthorized voter would have to show up at a polling place, give the full name and address of someone who was registered to vote there, but who hadn’t already voted, forge that person’s signature in the poll book and hope that nobody there would know they were not that person.

All of which was already illegal as hell. And all of which violates the undocumented alien’s prime directive: Don’t call attention to yourself, especially with any government agency.But, then, voter suppression laws don’t necessarily have to exist either, in order to work.

In Pennsylvania, a voter ID law that Republicans openly bragged would make that state winnable for Romney in 2012 was also blocked by a judge. But there was enough publicity about the law’s requirements that some estimated as many as 35,000 eligible voters didn’t bother that year.

Romney still lost Pennsylvania. But by half the margin that John McCain had lost it the election before.

Wisconsin, Ohio and other states, meanwhile, are moving to walk back other things designed to increase voter turnout. They are cutting back on advance voting, especially in places where a few polls were open on Sundays and church groups (mostly in black neighborhoods) would hire a bus and drive to vote after their service.

All dressed up with somewhere really important to go.

Next Page >


Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment


About Reader Comments


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Videos
Jobs
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.