A ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby would not "undermine reproductive rights and anti-discrimination laws"; it would simply affect the way contraceptives are paid for. Hobby Lobby employees (and employees everywhere) would still have access to all FDA-approved birth control, to be used as they wish. They will not be able to do this without paying for them, however.
A favorable ruling will not "exclude preventive health care services for women" while continuing to provide them for men, as stated. Pap smears, mammograms and a variety of other preventive health care services will not be affected at all. Again, all contraceptives will be available, but not as an insurance benefit.
David Green and many others object to funding others’ contraceptives. These objections do not come from a desire to "pick and choose which laws they obey." Realistically, a ruling for Hobby Lobby would likely have limited, if any, impact on most women’s health care costs. However, for the Greens, and for others with religious objections to the ACA, it is a very big deal indeed.
Duane J. Harris
Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.