The Sutherland Institute found Utah’s brief against same sex marriage "brilliant" and "impenetrable" ("State makes it all about kids in brief against same-sex marriage," Tribune, Feb. 4). I found it "cautionary and disturbing."
It struck me as just another statement by Utah’s religious/political establishment giving its opinion on a moral issue, saying why their opinion is superior to all others and why everyone else should have to adhere to it. I saw very little in the brief that had to do with constitutional law or precedent.
I’m a live and let live kind of guy. If a church doesn’t want to allow same sex marriage within its organization, it shouldn’t be forced to. If a same-sex couple wants to be married in a civil ceremony, let them. Keep it simple. I expect the Supreme Court will see it that way, too.
Salt Lake City
Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.