Quantcast

Op-ed: Voters should know who contributors are

Published January 25, 2014 1:01 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2014, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

In 2013, I became aware of significant problems with the lack of transparency in the political process in Utah. Prior to that time, contributions made directly to a candidate or to a Political Action Committee (PAC) were legally required to be disclosed, while donations made to 501(c)(4) non-profit advocacy organizations for use in a political campaign could be made anonymously.

From my perspective, it didn't make sense to have differing standards for various entities engaged in the same political activities. If we were going to require some groups to disclose and not others, there would obviously be significant incentives for distortion within the process.

I concluded that the public would be better served by greater transparency and consistency under the law. As a result of these concerns, I sponsored legislation (House Bill 43) which standardized disclosure and reporting requirements for all political activity regardless of the type of organization doing the work. Needless to say, it was met by fierce opposition from political operatives of all stripes.

But in the end, I am satisfied that the people of Utah got a much-needed boost to the openness of our political process. Voters now have a greater ability to understand the motives of those involved and the messages they put forward.

While I firmly believe in the fundamental right of free speech, it is imperative that the listener be allowed to determine who is doing the speaking and why, in order to intelligently weigh the information expressed.

As it turns out, the passage of HB43 has proven to be quite judicious in light of the revelations recently exposed as a result of the House investigation of former Attorney General John Swallow.

The inconsistency in the law had resulted in what was essentially a convoluted money laundering scheme whereby candidates were able to wash contributions from PACs through 501(c)(4) non-profit entities, thereby shielding the identities of those bankrolling specific candidates and issues.

According to investigators, just one 501(c)(4), the Proper Role of Government Education Association, was able to funnel more than $450,000 in contributions through its coffers. This money was then inserted into Utah races without donor disclosure and no ability for the voters or the press to determine where the money was actually coming from and what the motives of the funders might be.

In writing about this legislation in Utah Political Capitol, Curtis Haring stated, "If an individual or corporation is spending tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of dollars to influence an election – the public has a right to know who is paying for it. Hughes' bill would provide a more level playing field and make the process more open."

I couldn't agree more.

Greg Hughes is a state representative from Draper.

 

 


USER COMMENTS
Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus