Get breaking news alerts via email

Click here to manage your alerts
Op-ed: Nation still waits for compromise on immigration

By Mark Alvarez and Tiani Xochitl Coleman

First Published Jan 25 2014 01:01 am • Last Updated Mar 24 2014 11:35 pm

Last year, apparent progress on immigration ran into the never-ending standstill: "How do we address the 11.7 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States?"

Emotions run high. Political responses are commonly quick, and substantive discussion is rare. When the "gang of eight" crafted a solution, some senators suffered hits. Polarization forced retreat back to established lines, possibly pushing reform to 2015.

Join the Discussion
Post a Comment

Shouldn’t we approach divisive issues collaboratively? How can we implement a functioning immigration system?

Certainly a key to effective reform lies in resolving the situation of the 11.7 million: not only because we’re dealing with real people, real lives, and broken laws, but also because the entire immigration system must rest on a proper balance of rule of law, humanity, accountability, closing loopholes and flexibility. We need a sustainable, symbiotic immigration system for those seeking refuge and opportunity.

We can solve this not by splitting a pie among interest groups but by talking honestly about legalization and citizenship.

Most concede that mass deportations would be impractical and inhumane. Most also want to avoid repeating the 1986 amnesty that incentivized breaking the law. But some label as amnesty any leniency short of self-deportation forced by harsh enforcement. Let’s recognize that the 1986 amnesty included enforcement. The problem was that it didn’t provide for a workable immigrant or non-immigrant visa system for lesser-skilled workers. This poor mismatch of harsh law with wink-and-nod enforcement encouraged workers to come here illegally. Law then isolated them in the shadows, despite their economic and societal contributions. While they broke the law, we, too, need to accept some responsibility.

Giving people a second chance, with penalties and a long road, isn’t amnesty. This approach would be problematic if we rewarded those who broke the law to the exclusion of others. So why not provide a path to legalization without being harsh?

A more open non-immigrant or immigrant visa category would not be unprecedented, certainly not given the seemingly intractable circumstances. Those who qualify could immediately apply for basic legalization. Let’s not repeat the problem by continuing to have non-existent lines for most people while giving legalization only to a few.

While we need not automatically or immediately grant citizenship to undocumented immigrants, a path to legalization, without a possibility of citizenship, isn’t enough. Let’s reform immigration categories to allow honorable, committed non-immigrants eventually to earn adjustment of their status to immigrant. Many people aren’t interested in becoming citizens.

They just want to be able to safely go back and forth from their home country to work when there’s opportunity, without fear. But let’s give those who have made, or plan to make, this country their home a way for them to integrate and become responsible, full participants in our communities.

story continues below
story continues below

Perhaps the "gang of eight" was on to something. Cool heads, proper motives, honest dialogue and a few adjustments could lead to a long-awaited solution. Voters should urge Congress to break the standstill.

Mark Alvarez is an attorney, immigration specialist for Telemundo Utah and host of ‘Sin Rodeos.’ Tiani Xochitl Coleman has practiced immigration law pro bono and is past chair of the Salt Lake County Republican Party.

Copyright 2014 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Top Reader Comments Read All Comments Post a Comment
Click here to read all comments   Click here to post a comment

About Reader Comments

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
Staying Connected
Contests and Promotions
  • Search Obituaries
  • Place an Obituary

  • Search Cars
  • Search Homes
  • Search Jobs
  • Search Marketplace
  • Search Legal Notices

  • Other Services
  • Advertise With Us
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
  • Access your e-Edition
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact a newsroom staff member
  • Access the Trib Archives
  • Privacy Policy
  • Missing your paper? Need to place your paper on vacation hold? For this and any other subscription related needs, click here or call 801.204.6100.