Quantcast

Denver Post: Hard to believe, Utah got there first

Published December 26, 2013 11:19 am
The Denver Post
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

A federal judge's decision to overturn Utah's voter-approved constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman sets the template for what could happen in Colorado.

We hope it doesn't have to go this way.

Make no mistake, we would like to see Colorado's Amendment 43 overturned.

But we'd prefer it were done by voters, and that some group puts the matter on the ballot sometime in the near future. Voter-approved gay marriage would very likely be less controversial — and far less resented — than court-ordered gay marriage.

In March, Colorado lawmakers approved the Colorado Civil Union Act, which provides committed couples with critical legal protections and responsibilities.

Now it's time for voters to approve the right for gay people to marry.

It's hard to believe Utah got there first.

 

 


USER COMMENTS
Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus