Letter: We've stopped considering interests of children

Published December 27, 2013 1:01 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

I recall studying the women's suffrage movement back in high school. Throughout it all, one argument was used over and over: Do it for the children. Women voting, they argued, would end child labor practices and make sure the government had the interests of the children in mind.

Compare that to the arguments surrounding today's most politically charged subjects: A women's right to an abortion, they tell us, supersedes the right of the child to live. The right of homosexual couples to wed and raise children is far more important than any effect that could have on the children themselves.

We are told not to worry about the massive deficits our government runs up, because clearly the illusion of "jumpstarting" the economy is more important than the insufferable debts being passed on to the next generation.

We used to understand that, as adults, we had a responsibility to look after the interests of children at the expense of our own interests. The current discourse reflects the loss of that understanding.

Jacob Brown

South Jordan

Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus