Quantcast

Letter: Food dangerous to pets should be labeled

Published November 12, 2013 1:01 am

This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Certain common foods are extremely dangerous for domesticated animals. According to an article on WebMD, "Last year, there were more than 100,000 cases of pet poisoning in the U.S. Many of these were caused by household substances that may seem perfectly harmless to you. But just because something is safe for people doesn't mean it won't hurt beloved pets."

There are labels warning about the dangers of honey for babies, and telling consumers a food was manufactured in a plant where nut products are made. However, there is nothing warning people of the danger to dogs and cats of chocolate, grapes, vanilla and even cashews and avocados.

Many soaps, shampoos and cleaning products already have animal warnings. Similar labels should be required on foods most dangerous to animals. As a veterinary technician student, I know we'll never be able to stop people from feeding their pets table scraps. But warning labels would greatly reduce the tragic deaths of so many pets fed "people food" by well-meaning but uninformed owners.

Sable Tanner

Orem

USER COMMENTS
Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus