Letter: Washington to vote on GMO food labeling

Published November 2, 2013 1:01 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Re "Argentina's woes highlight need for GMO food labeling," Forum, Oct. 29): All eyes are on Washington state as the Nov. 5 election draws near with a ballot measure asking voters to decide if the state should require GMO food to be labeled.

California 2012 voters' rejection of Proposition 37, which would have required mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food, proved the power of industry dollars is entrenched. If industry spends enough dollars and creates a clever enough marketing campaign, almost any state ballot proposition that threatens business can be killed!

Pesticide companies like Monsanto, DOW Agrisciences and Bayer CropScience poured millions of dollars into defeating Prop. 37. I wonder why?

Here's hoping Washington's ballot measure is a success. Since no one really knows the health risks of genetically modified foods, citizens should have the right to know what they are buying and consuming.

Cory Jensen


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus