Poor intersection

Published August 17, 2013 1:01 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Re the July 29 Tribune article "Newfangled intersections can be bad for business":

Utah Department of Transportation spokesman says the intersections solve a safety concern. If traffic is backing up on the freeway, wouldn't it be possible to simply extend the timing of the lights for the traffic exiting the freeway only during afternoon rush hour, say 4 to 7 p.m.? I believe this is an example of "filling a tea cup with a fire hose." I was surprised to see the cost quote of $5 million. How much would it have cost to have an engineer adjust the lights?

The article also quotes a study by Avenue Consultants that an estimated $1.25 million was saved in the first year in time and gasoline. How do they figure the cost of time? That had to be some complicated process to determine a 30-second savings. When you go south through the intersection and want to turn left on 12300 South you have to negotiate four lights instead of one. Do I save 30 seconds? I doubt it.

Businesses around this intersection already faced difficulty with ingress and egress and this design obviously has increased that difficulty. Where is the common sense?

Pete Schobert


Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus