Quantcast

Abortion issue complex

Published June 2, 2013 4:17 pm
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Jim Timmel's "Born and unborn" (Forum, May 19) lacks an understanding of the complexity of the abortion issue. Whether pro-choice or anti-abortion, few would argue that the conviction of Dr. Hermit Gosnell for murdering newborn babies is not deserved.

However, the conviction is far from being an example that justifies an across-the-board law making all abortion illegal. There is a difference between aborting a potential baby and killing a baby.

No one "favors abortion." This terminology is inflammatory. Pro-choice does not imply that abortion is a "favorable" option.

Timmel's opinion that women who make the choice to abort have made an "unwise choice" lacks perspective. There are cases of rape. There are cases in which the health of mother or fetus is threatened. There are cases that are no one's business but the mother's.

The difference between killing a newborn and a legal abortion lies in the difference between the capacity to sense the world. The ability to feel pain, which Timmel mentioned, is certainly a factor.

Ariel Gracey

Salt Lake City

USER COMMENTS
Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus